Daily Archive: November 24, 2025
![[24/11, 19:45] Sekarreporter: “The High Court of Madras, through its judgment dated 17.10.2025 in M/s Viterra B.V. v. M/s SKT Textile Mills1, held that a party which deliberately chooses not to participate in the arbitral proceedings cannot use its own default as a ground to resist enforcement under Section 48(1)(b) of the A&C Act and upheld the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award rendered under the International Cotton Association, Liverpool (“ICA”),” https://www.mondaq.com/india/arbitration-dispute-resolution/1708896/high-court-of-madras-held-that-deliberate-nonparticipation-cannot-defeat-the-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral-award#:~:text=The%20High%20Court%20of,Cotton%20Association%2C%20Liverpool%20(%22ICA%22)%2C [24/11, 19:45] Sekarreporter: .](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
[24/11, 19:45] Sekarreporter: “The High Court of Madras, through its judgment dated 17.10.2025 in M/s Viterra B.V. v. M/s SKT Textile Mills1, held that a party which deliberately chooses not to participate in the arbitral proceedings cannot use its own default as a ground to resist enforcement under Section 48(1)(b) of the A&C Act and upheld the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award rendered under the International Cotton Association, Liverpool (“ICA”),” https://www.mondaq.com/india/arbitration-dispute-resolution/1708896/high-court-of-madras-held-that-deliberate-nonparticipation-cannot-defeat-the-enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral-award#:~:text=The%20High%20Court%20of,Cotton%20Association%2C%20Liverpool%20(%22ICA%22)%2C [24/11, 19:45] Sekarreporter: .
[24/11, 19:45] Sekarreporter: “The High Court of Madras, through its judgment dated 17.10.2025 in M/s Viterra B.V. v. M/s SKT Textile Mills1, held that a party which deliberately chooses not to participate in the...
[24/11, 19:39] Sekarreporter: “the SHOs/Inspectors of Police. The Court made it clear that, except for this portion, all other directions were to be scrupulously followed by the Director General of Police. The Court, thus, allowed the appeal, ordered that there would be no costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. [State of T. N. v. Vijayarani, LPA No. 45 of 2025, decided on 19-11-2025] *Judgment authored by: Justice N. Sathish Kumar Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants: A. Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondent: N. Palani Kumar” https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/11/24/mad-hc-disciplinary-action-against-sps-unjustified-io-failure-to-file-report/#:~:text=the%20SHOs/Inspectors,N.%20Palani%20Kumar [24/11, 19:39] Sekarreporter: 👍
[24/11, 19:39] Sekarreporter: “the SHOs/Inspectors of Police. The Court made it clear that, except for this portion, all other directions were to be scrupulously followed by the Director General of Police. The Court, thus,...
[24/11, 19:31] Sekarreporter: “Justice P.B. Balaji, hearing a civil revision petition filed by the husband, modified the Family Court’s direction that required him to pay Rs.15,000 per month, fixing the amount at Rs. 10,000 instead.” https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/madras-high-court-slashes-maintenance-after-wifes-rs-1-lakh-pay-surfaces-1542050#:~:text=Justice%20P.B.%20Balaji%2C%20hearing%20a%20civil%20revision%20petition%20filed%20by%20the%20husband%2C%20modified%20the%20Family%20Court%E2%80%99s%20direction%20that%20required%20him%20to%20pay%20Rs.15%2C000%20per%20month%2C%20fixing%20the%20amount%20at%20Rs.%2010%2C000%20instead. [24/11, 19:31] Sekarreporter: 👍
[24/11, 19:31] Sekarreporter: “Justice P.B. Balaji, hearing a civil revision petition filed by the husband, modified the Family Court’s direction that required him to pay Rs.15,000 per month, fixing the amount at Rs. 10,000...
the court smsj bench wondered if film financiers could claim such exorbitant interest. The court remarked that it had to be seen whether such a demand for exorbitant interest would be against the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act 2003.
The Madras High Court, on Monday, stayed a single judge order directing actor Vishal to pay Rs. 30 crore due to the entertainment company Lyca Productions. The bench of Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice...
Bjp legal president kumara guru
[24/11, 17:11] Sekarreporter: 20.11.2025 Tmt. Archana Patnaik I A S., Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) & Secretary to Government. Email: ceo@tn.gov.in Secretariat, St George Fort, Chennai-9 Subject: Representation Seeking Action Against Mr.A. Raja, Member of...
[24/11, 16:40] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/barandbench/status/1992904048060796955?t=qLvvFYOrl3Jdphq8NzMLgg&s=08 [24/11, 16:40] Sekarreporter: Supreme Court hears Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah mosque dispute Sr Adv Shyam Divan appears for the Hindu side: This has a huge impact on other suits. When there is a lead suit then if we were to make it representative suit on behalf of plaintiff then it should be become the leading suit. There is a bar. HC has recognised that it is defendants representative suit. #KrishnaJanmabhoomi #SupremeCourt [24/11, 16:40] Sekarreporter: Justice PV Sanjay Kumar: Adjourned to Monday. We have not issued notice yet. We will just hear it further.
[24/11, 16:40] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/barandbench/status/1992904048060796955?t=qLvvFYOrl3Jdphq8NzMLgg&s=08 [24/11, 16:40] Sekarreporter: Supreme Court hears Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah mosque dispute Sr Adv Shyam Divan appears for the Hindu side: This has a huge impact on other suits. When there...