Daily Archive: November 18, 2025

Case Title: Manithaneya Makkal Katchi v. The Election Commission of India and Another  Case No: WP 42811 of 2025

Case Title: Manithaneya Makkal Katchi v. The Election Commission of India and Another Case No: WP 42811 of 2025

[18/11, 11:59] Sekarreporter: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-eci-response-plea-against-delisting-manithaneya-makkal-katchi-310263 [18/11, 11:59] Sekarreporter: The Madras High Court has directed the Election Commission of India to respond to a plea by the Manithaneya Makkal Katchi (MMK), challenging the ECI’s order delisting...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Justice P B Balaji, while ordering notice to HR&CE and other respondents including the DGP, granted a week’s time for filing the counter-affidavit, and adjourned the hearing to November 24.  The petition was filed by advocate and activist ‘Elephant’ G Rajendran

Justice P B Balaji, while ordering notice to HR&CE and other respondents including the DGP, granted a week’s time for filing the counter-affidavit, and adjourned the hearing to November 24. The petition was filed by advocate and activist ‘Elephant’ G Rajendran

[18/11, 11:54] Sekarreporter: “Add TNIE As A Trusted Source CHENNAI: The Madras HC on Monday directed the HR&CE department and the DGP to file counter-affidavit to a petition seeking preparation of a crowd management...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/barandbench/status/1990655976660480196?t=Qu5Hs3ao8I-p5e3ZC27SNw&s=08 [18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: #Breaking  “Need time to read the Lokpal order”.   Delhi High Court adjourns to Friday TMC MP Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging the Lokpal order granting sanction to CBI to chargesheet her in the alleged cash-for-query row.   The Lokpal order was given to the Court today in a sealed envelope.   @MahuaMoitra #Lokpal

[18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/barandbench/status/1990655976660480196?t=Qu5Hs3ao8I-p5e3ZC27SNw&s=08 [18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: #Breaking “Need time to read the Lokpal order”. Delhi High Court adjourns to Friday TMC MP Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging the Lokpal order granting sanction to CBI to chargesheet her in the alleged cash-for-query row. The Lokpal order was given to the Court today in a sealed envelope. @MahuaMoitra #Lokpal

[18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/barandbench/status/1990655976660480196?t=Qu5Hs3ao8I-p5e3ZC27SNw&s=08 [18/11, 11:49] Sekarreporter: #Breaking “Need time to read the Lokpal order”. Delhi High Court adjourns to Friday TMC MP Mahua Moitra’s plea challenging the Lokpal order granting sanction to CBI...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/PTI_News/status/1990663188007059507?t=Bp8YkId4qPKObr0oBYJmFg&s=08 [18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: STORY | SC by 2:1 majority recalls verdict barring post-facto green clearances, Justice Bhuyan dissents  The Supreme Court, by a 2:1 majority, on Tuesday recalled its May 16 judgment that had prohibited the Centre from granting retrospective environmental clearances (ECs) to projects found violating environmental norms.  READ: ptinews.com/story/national…

[18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/PTI_News/status/1990663188007059507?t=Bp8YkId4qPKObr0oBYJmFg&s=08 [18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: STORY | SC by 2:1 majority recalls verdict barring post-facto green clearances, Justice Bhuyan dissents The Supreme Court, by a 2:1 majority, on Tuesday recalled its May 16 judgment that had prohibited the Centre from granting retrospective environmental clearances (ECs) to projects found violating environmental norms. READ: ptinews.com/story/national…

[18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: https://x.com/PTI_News/status/1990663188007059507?t=Bp8YkId4qPKObr0oBYJmFg&s=08 [18/11, 11:47] Sekarreporter: STORY | SC by 2:1 majority recalls verdict barring post-facto green clearances, Justice Bhuyan dissents The Supreme Court, by a 2:1 majority, on Tuesday recalled its May...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Vinothpandian: Madras high court : AS no 6 of 2020  G Thangasamy Nadar ( died ) vs Dr D Rajkumar   dated 4th nov 2025 : with regard to admissibility of a electronic evidence under section 65 B (4) Indian evidence act , held certificate issued by a browsing centre is not sufficient for

Vinothpandian: Madras high court : AS no 6 of 2020 G Thangasamy Nadar ( died ) vs Dr D Rajkumar dated 4th nov 2025 : with regard to admissibility of a electronic evidence under section 65 B (4) Indian evidence act , held certificate issued by a browsing centre is not sufficient for

[18/11, 11:44] Vinothpandian: Madras high court : AS no 6 of 2020 G Thangasamy Nadar ( died ) vs Dr D Rajkumar dated 4th nov 2025 : with regard to admissibility of a electronic...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version