SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: September 28, 2025

Uncategorized

நீதிபதிகள் பி.வி.நாகரத்னா மற்றும் நீதிபதி ஆர். மகாதேவன் ஆகியோர் அடங்கிய டிவிஷன் பெஞ்ச் , “குற்றவியல் நடைமுறைச் சட்டத்தின் பிரிவு 374(2) இன் கீழ் மேல்முறையீடுகளை விசாரிக்கும் போது, ​​உயர் நீதிமன்றம் அதன் மேல்முறையீட்டு அதிகார வரம்பைப் பயன்படுத்துகிறது என்பதை நாங்கள் கவனிக்கிறோம்.

முகப்புப் பக்கம் / நீதிமன்ற புதுப்பிப்புகள் / உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் தண்டனைக்கு எதிரான மேல்முறையீடுகளை விசாரிக்கும்போது சுயாதீனமான மனதைப் பயன்படுத்துதல் தேவை U/S.374(2) CrPC; நீதிமன்றம் உண்மைகள் மற்றும் ஆதாரங்களை மறு மதிப்பீடு செய்ய வேண்டும்: உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் குற்றம் சாட்டப்பட்டவர்களை விடுவித்த உயர்நீதிமன்ற டிவிஷன் பெஞ்சின்...

Uncategorized

Sathis kumar judge The rally in Karur turned into a major disaster following concerns raised by the Madras High Court. The High Court had last week asked whether such a large number of people would not cause accidents and what would happen if something happened to people

MALAYALAME-PAPERKAZHCHA SUNDAY, 28 SEPTEMBER 2025 7.31 AM IST HOME / INDIA / GENERALWhat court feared has happened; Madras HC had raised concerns about possible accident at TVK rallies earlier Saturday 27 September, 2025 | 11:03 PMREAD MALAYALAM VERSIONCHENNAI:...

“Conclusion: 31. In the present case, the respondents relied on the bank statement produced by the petitioner. It is the statement issued by the Bank of Baroda, Virugambakkam, Tamil Nadu. The account stands in the name of the petitioner. The statements of accounts from 03.01.2024 till 26.01.2025 have been produced before this Court. Perusal of the statement would show that the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.58,06,479.20/-. That apart, the petitioner himself admitted that he has two properties in his name and he has made no attempt to alienate the said properties.” https://www.sekarreporter.com/mr-justice-s-m-subramaniam-and-the-honourable-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq-cmp-no-19328-of-2025-in-osa-sr-no-17760-of-2025-s-venkatesan/#:~:text=Conclusion%3A%0A31,the%20said%20properties.

Uncategorized

“Conclusion: 31. In the present case, the respondents relied on the bank statement produced by the petitioner. It is the statement issued by the Bank of Baroda, Virugambakkam, Tamil Nadu. The account stands in the name of the petitioner. The statements of accounts from 03.01.2024 till 26.01.2025 have been produced before this Court. Perusal of the statement would show that the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.58,06,479.20/-. That apart, the petitioner himself admitted that he has two properties in his name and he has made no attempt to alienate the said properties.” https://www.sekarreporter.com/mr-justice-s-m-subramaniam-and-the-honourable-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq-cmp-no-19328-of-2025-in-osa-sr-no-17760-of-2025-s-venkatesan/#:~:text=Conclusion%3A%0A31,the%20said%20properties.

“Conclusion: 31. In the present case, the respondents relied on the bank statement produced by the petitioner. It is the statement issued by the Bank of Baroda, Virugambakkam, Tamil Nadu. The account stands in...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com