Daily Archive: November 18, 2022

Domestic violence act full.bench order of.   Madras high court.  THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH  THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN  AND  THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA  Crl.O.P. SR. Nos.31852, 28394, 29208, 29745, 32249, 32612, 32966, 33350,

Domestic violence act full.bench order of. Madras high court. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P. SR. Nos.31852, 28394, 29208, 29745, 32249, 32612, 32966, 33350,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 15.10.2022 DELIVERED ON :   17.11.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN AND THE HON’BLE...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM     W.P.No.32592 of 2016     M.Muthu            …  Petitioner.    For Petitioner               : Dr.R.Gowri                                                                For M/s.R.Meenakshi                         For Respondents           : Mr.A.Murugan                                                                Central Government Standing    Counsel   The 1st respondent shall ensure that the Government of India orders are effectively implemented and actions are initiated against the Higher Officials, who all are practising the colonial system of orderly in their Battalion by using the constables/combatant/other employee for their personal works either at their residence or elsewhere.     With the above said directions, the writ petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.32592 of 2016   M.Muthu            …  Petitioner. For Petitioner               : Dr.R.Gowri                                                               For M/s.R.Meenakshi                     For Respondents           : Mr.A.Murugan                                                               Central Government Standing   Counsel The 1st respondent shall ensure that the Government of India orders are effectively implemented and actions are initiated against the Higher Officials, who all are practising the colonial system of orderly in their Battalion by using the constables/combatant/other employee for their personal works either at their residence or elsewhere. With the above said directions, the writ petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED  :   18.11.2022   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.32592 of 2016   M.Muthu                                                                           …  Petitioner   Vs....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 261 : bharat petroleum corporation ltd vs P umapathy : order 2 rule 2CPC 1908 intended to prevent multiplicity of proceedings , not throw out genuine litigant at threshold

Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 261 : bharat petroleum corporation ltd vs P umapathy : order 2 rule 2CPC 1908 intended to prevent multiplicity of proceedings , not throw out genuine litigant at threshold

Sekarreporter[11/14, 07:28] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 261 : bharat petroleum corporation ltd vs P umapathy : order 2 rule 2CPC 1908 intended to prevent multiplicity of proceedings , not throw out genuine litigant at...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY  A.S.No.608 of 2011  Muthusamy.   For Appellants  	  : Mr.T.Murugamanickam, Senior Counsel,    for Mr.C.S.Saravanan.     For Respondents  	  : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy, Senior Counsel,     for Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran.(for R3-R6)  : Steps Taken (for R1 & R2)  JUDGMENT  A.The Appeal Suit:-    Upon execution of the sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs either by the defendants or by Court, the defendants will be entitled for payment out of the entire balance sale consideration of Rs.15,02,100/- deposited by the plaintiffs along with accrued interest and the Trial Court shall pay the same, to the defendants without insisting for any formal application, only upon verification of the identity of the defendants; iii) The plaintiffs are entitled for costs throughout.  .11.2022  Index:Yes/No

THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.608 of 2011 Muthusamy. For Appellants : Mr.T.Murugamanickam, Senior Counsel,    for Mr.C.S.Saravanan. For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy, Senior Counsel,     for Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran.(for R3-R6) : Steps Taken (for R1 & R2) JUDGMENT A.The Appeal Suit:-  Upon execution of the sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs either by the defendants or by Court, the defendants will be entitled for payment out of the entire balance sale consideration of Rs.15,02,100/- deposited by the plaintiffs along with accrued interest and the Trial Court shall pay the same, to the defendants without insisting for any formal application, only upon verification of the identity of the defendants; iii) The plaintiffs are entitled for costs throughout. .11.2022 Index:Yes/No

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on :  31.10.2022 Judgment Delivered on :     .11.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.608 of 2011 Muthusamy Karuppusamy Rangasamy Purushothaman Veerakumarasamy Balusamy...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Hon’ble Minister for Electricity, Prohibition & Excise Thiru V. Senthil Balaji has filed a suit for defamation & injunction against Mr. CTR Nirmal Kumar, State Secretary of BJP IT Wing, TN.  Today the suit came up for admission before Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan of the Madras High Court.

Hon’ble Minister for Electricity, Prohibition & Excise Thiru V. Senthil Balaji has filed a suit for defamation & injunction against Mr. CTR Nirmal Kumar, State Secretary of BJP IT Wing, TN. Today the suit came up for admission before Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan of the Madras High Court.

  Hon’ble Minister for Electricity, Prohibition & Excise Thiru V. Senthil Balaji has filed a suit for defamation & injunction against Mr. CTR Nirmal Kumar, State Secretary of BJP IT Wing, TN. Today the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
W.P.No.30666 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.30104, 30105 of 2022  SURESH KUMAR,J.  Dr.D.Simon, learned Central Government Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents 1, 2 and 6, Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.U.M.Ravichandran, learned  Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 3 and 4, Ms.M.Sneha, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the 5th respondent and Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the 8th respondent.

W.P.No.30666 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.30104, 30105 of 2022 SURESH KUMAR,J. Dr.D.Simon, learned Central Government Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents 1, 2 and 6, Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.U.M.Ravichandran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 3 and 4, Ms.M.Sneha, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the 5th respondent and Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the 8th respondent.

W.P.No.30666 of 2022 and WMP.Nos.30104, 30105 of 2022 SURESH KUMAR,J. Dr.D.Simon, learned Central Government Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents 1, 2 and 6, Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.U.M.Ravichandran, learned...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
W.P.No.28147 of 2022  THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE  AND              D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J.  (Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice)  Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner assailing the Search Committee constituted for the purpose of selection of the Vice-Chancello.r   submitted that it is in gross violation of Clause 7.3.0(ii) of the UGC Regulations, inasmuch as the Secretary  to Government, Higher and Technical Education, Government of Puducherry, is the ProChancellor of  Puducherry Technological University according to the Puducherry Technological University Act, 2019.  Issue notice to the respondents; returnable in two weeks.  Private notice is also permitted.  List after two weeks.  (T.R., A.C.J.)           (D.K.K., J.)   r

W.P.No.28147 of 2022 THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND             D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J. (Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner assailing the Search Committee constituted for the purpose of selection of the Vice-Chancello.r submitted that it is in gross violation of Clause 7.3.0(ii) of the UGC Regulations, inasmuch as the Secretary  to Government, Higher and Technical Education, Government of Puducherry, is the ProChancellor of  Puducherry Technological University according to the Puducherry Technological University Act, 2019. Issue notice to the respondents; returnable in two weeks. Private notice is also permitted. List after two weeks. (T.R., A.C.J.)           (D.K.K., J.) r

W.P.No.28147 of 2022 THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J. (Order of the court was made by the Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner assailing the Search Committee constituted for...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version