SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: November 9, 2022

The judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, in S.C.No.600/2017 dated 12.02.2020 is modified accordingly.                       (iii) All the above sentences are ordered to run concurrently. The period of sentence already undergone by the appellants/A1, A4 & A5 is ordered to be set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.                                                                       [J.N.B., J.]  &   [N.A.V., J.]                                                                                   08.11.2022 Index           : Yes Internet        : Yes PJL To The Principal Sessions Judge,     Tirunelveli. The Inspector of Police,     CBCID, Kanyakumari District,     Nagercoil. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,     Madurai. 4.The Record Keeper,    Vernacular Records Section,    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,    Madurai.           J.NISHA BANU, J AND N.ANAND VENKATESH, J     PJL       Judgment made in Crl. A.(MD)Nos.168, 180 & 204 of 2020 and 386 of 2021    

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 9, 2022

The judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, in S.C.No.600/2017 dated 12.02.2020 is modified accordingly.                       (iii) All the above sentences are ordered to run concurrently. The period of sentence already undergone by the appellants/A1, A4 & A5 is ordered to be set off under Section 428 Cr.P.C. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.                                                                       [J.N.B., J.]  &   [N.A.V., J.]                                                                                   08.11.2022 Index           : Yes Internet        : Yes PJL To The Principal Sessions Judge,     Tirunelveli. The Inspector of Police,     CBCID, Kanyakumari District,     Nagercoil. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,     Madurai. 4.The Record Keeper,    Vernacular Records Section,    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,    Madurai.           J.NISHA BANU, J AND N.ANAND VENKATESH, J     PJL       Judgment made in Crl. A.(MD)Nos.168, 180 & 204 of 2020 and 386 of 2021    

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT   Reserved on  :  31.10.2022 Pronounced on :   08.11.2022 CORAM:   THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH   Crl.A...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH   Crl. A. (MD)No.229 of 2020   Karuppaiah         .. Appellant். For Appellant               : Mr.I.Murugesan                                                             Legal Aid Counsel                     For Respondent            : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor            JUDGMENT   Before parting with the matter, this Court appreciates the efforts taken by the legal aid counsel who appraised this Court with all the available materials it enabled this Court to come to a final conclusion. In view of the same, there shall be a direction to the Legal Services Committee to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the legal aid counsel as remuneration.                                                                       [M.S.R., J.]  &   [N.A.V., J.]                                                                                       07.11.2022 Index           : Yes Internet        : Yes RR To 1.The IV Additional and Sessions Judge,  Tirunelveli. 2.The Inspector of Police,    Tiruvengadam Police Station,    Tenkasi District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,     Madurai. 4.The Record Keeper,    Vernacular Records Section,    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,    Madurai.     M.S.RAMESH, J AND N.ANAND VENKATESH, J    

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 9, 2022

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH   Crl. A. (MD)No.229 of 2020   Karuppaiah         .. Appellant். For Appellant               : Mr.I.Murugesan                                                             Legal Aid Counsel                     For Respondent            : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor            JUDGMENT   Before parting with the matter, this Court appreciates the efforts taken by the legal aid counsel who appraised this Court with all the available materials it enabled this Court to come to a final conclusion. In view of the same, there shall be a direction to the Legal Services Committee to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to the legal aid counsel as remuneration.                                                                       [M.S.R., J.]  &   [N.A.V., J.]                                                                                       07.11.2022 Index           : Yes Internet        : Yes RR To 1.The IV Additional and Sessions Judge,  Tirunelveli. 2.The Inspector of Police,    Tiruvengadam Police Station,    Tenkasi District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,     Madurai. 4.The Record Keeper,    Vernacular Records Section,    Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,    Madurai.     M.S.RAMESH, J AND N.ANAND VENKATESH, J    

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT   Dated: 07.11.2022   CORAM:   THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH   Crl. A. (MD)No.229 of 2020   Karuppaiah ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Honest lawyers could also be successful, he says Justice V. Ramasubramaniam of the Supreme Court on Tuesday dissuaded young lawyers from considering ethics and the legal profession to be an oxymoron and cited examples of old timers such as octogenarian senior counsel S. Ramasubramaniam for having proven that honest lawyers could also be successful.

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 9, 2022

Honest lawyers could also be successful, he says Justice V. Ramasubramaniam of the Supreme Court on Tuesday dissuaded young lawyers from considering ethics and the legal profession to be an oxymoron and cited examples of old timers such as octogenarian senior counsel S. Ramasubramaniam for having proven that honest lawyers could also be successful.

Honest lawyers could also be successful, he says Justice V. Ramasubramaniam of the Supreme Court on Tuesday dissuaded young lawyers from considering ethics and the legal profession to be an oxymoron and cited examples...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR WP.No.8928 of 2013 Dr.E.Chitra       … Petitioner. Managing Partner Vs. Territory Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and another reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1042 and the Honourable Supreme Court has directed the respondent to vacate and hand over the possession.  As the respondent Corporation is squatting in the property without paying any rent after expiry of lease in the year 1998, they cannot continue in possession of the property as their possession is nothing but illegal as that of a trespasser and they are bound to vacate the premises.  Considering the above position of law, now for the sake of defending their possession, the respondent corporation cannot take a different stand during the submissions that the property belong to wakf and that is also not permissible in law, since they are estopped from denying the title of the landlord.  Now it is stated that the licence issued to the dealer also has been suspended due to some irregularities and the same has been challenged.  Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Writ Petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to hand over vacant possession of the premises to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No costs.   

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 9, 2022

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR WP.No.8928 of 2013 Dr.E.Chitra       … Petitioner. Managing Partner Vs. Territory Manager, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and another reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1042 and the Honourable Supreme Court has directed the respondent to vacate and hand over the possession.  As the respondent Corporation is squatting in the property without paying any rent after expiry of lease in the year 1998, they cannot continue in possession of the property as their possession is nothing but illegal as that of a trespasser and they are bound to vacate the premises.  Considering the above position of law, now for the sake of defending their possession, the respondent corporation cannot take a different stand during the submissions that the property belong to wakf and that is also not permissible in law, since they are estopped from denying the title of the landlord.  Now it is stated that the licence issued to the dealer also has been suspended due to some irregularities and the same has been challenged.  Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Writ Petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to hand over vacant possession of the premises to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. No costs.   

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:    14.10.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR WP.No.8928 of 2013 Dr.E.Chitra       … Petitioner Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Represented by is Territory Manager, Mr.Thangavel,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Will he ? Won’t He?           Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan                            Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud was recommended by Chief Justice U U Lalit  to the Central Government,as his successor, keeping in with the spirit and script of constitutionalism. Justice Chandrachud would be CJI for a two year period from Nov 9,2022  to Nov 24,2024, having been sworn in as India’s fiftieth Chief Justice. A long enough tenure to make his mark. As a pre eminent constitutional wizard, would he be ready, able and willing?

Uncategorized

 by · Published November 9, 2022

Will he ? Won’t He?           Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan                            Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud was recommended by Chief Justice U U Lalit  to the Central Government,as his successor, keeping in with the spirit and script of constitutionalism. Justice Chandrachud would be CJI for a two year period from Nov 9,2022  to Nov 24,2024, having been sworn in as India’s fiftieth Chief Justice. A long enough tenure to make his mark. As a pre eminent constitutional wizard, would he be ready, able and willing?

Will he ? Won’t He? Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan         Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud was recommended by Chief Justice U U Lalit  to the Central Government,as his successor, keeping in with the spirit and...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version