SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: March 4, 2020

CMA No. 4375/2019 against MCOP No. 308/2015- Special Sub Court, CBE- Justices M M Sundresh and Krishnan Ramasamy – set aside an award for Rs.1,93,60,000/- with interest and costs, by orders dt.18/2/2020. And Registrar General High Court has been directed to initiate departmental action against the said Judge who passed the award and had also passed several similar awards. Very interesting Judgment which needs to be reported widely in public interest

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 4, 2020

CMA No. 4375/2019 against MCOP No. 308/2015- Special Sub Court, CBE- Justices M M Sundresh and Krishnan Ramasamy – set aside an award for Rs.1,93,60,000/- with interest and costs, by orders dt.18/2/2020. And Registrar General High Court has been directed to initiate departmental action against the said Judge who passed the award and had also passed several similar awards. Very interesting Judgment which needs to be reported widely in public interest

[3/4, 20:27] Sekarreporter 1: C.M.A.No.4375 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.02.2020 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY C.M.A.No.4375 of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Joshop Prabakar: In a landmark Judgement, the Kerala High Court in the case of Sutherland Mortgage Services, Inc, has held that the Advance Ruling Authority had committed an error in not giving a ruling to the assessee citing lack of jurisdiction

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 4, 2020

Joshop Prabakar: In a landmark Judgement, the Kerala High Court in the case of Sutherland Mortgage Services, Inc, has held that the Advance Ruling Authority had committed an error in not giving a ruling to the assessee citing lack of jurisdiction

[3/4, 19:39] Joshop Prabakar: In a landmark Judgement, the Kerala High Court in the case of Sutherland Mortgage Services, Inc, has held that the Advance Ruling Authority had committed an error in not giving...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[3/4, 17:53] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 17:47] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Very rarely an additional judge is transferred before becoming permanent!it is not the case of justice kannan who went to P&H hc.It looks as if he was originally to be appointed in Delhi HC.Since that might not have been possible he was appointed here only to be shifted by transfer mode!Madras Hc has become launching pad for many and it looks like a transit house!!It is a pity that the Bar never discusses such issues! [3/4, 17:51] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 18:01] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: In service law there are several methods of appointing a person to a post.They are direct recruitment (e.g.Bar),promotion(e.g.service judges).But their there is yet another source .i.e.”transfer from other service”.This method is slowly entering in to the service of higher judiciary &it is not found in the Constitution.Justice MM Ismail was appointed in Delhi High court,when that court was created for the first time[1964] .After an year he was appointed to our high court in( 1965).!! It was not an involuntary act.After 55 years there is a repeat performance in a reverse order!!!!

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 4, 2020

[3/4, 17:53] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 17:47] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Very rarely an additional judge is transferred before becoming permanent!it is not the case of justice kannan who went to P&H hc.It looks as if he was originally to be appointed in Delhi HC.Since that might not have been possible he was appointed here only to be shifted by transfer mode!Madras Hc has become launching pad for many and it looks like a transit house!!It is a pity that the Bar never discusses such issues! [3/4, 17:51] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 18:01] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: In service law there are several methods of appointing a person to a post.They are direct recruitment (e.g.Bar),promotion(e.g.service judges).But their there is yet another source .i.e.”transfer from other service”.This method is slowly entering in to the service of higher judiciary &it is not found in the Constitution.Justice MM Ismail was appointed in Delhi High court,when that court was created for the first time[1964] .After an year he was appointed to our high court in( 1965).!! It was not an involuntary act.After 55 years there is a repeat performance in a reverse order!!!!

[3/4, 17:53] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 17:47] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Very rarely an additional judge is transferred before becoming permanent!it is not the case of justice kannan who went to P&H hc.It...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
(TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART 1 SECTION 2) No.K-13026/0 112020-US.I Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, NEW DELHI-I 10 011, dated 04th March, 2020. NOTIFICATION In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 222 of the Constitution of India, the President, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, is pleased to transfer Shri Justice Subramonium Prasad, Additional Judge of the Madras High Court, as an Additional Judge of the Delhi High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Delhi High Court. (Raji~h~:; Joint Secretary to the Government of India Tele: 2338 3037 To The Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi.

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 4, 2020

(TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART 1 SECTION 2) No.K-13026/0 112020-US.I Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, NEW DELHI-I 10 011, dated 04th March, 2020. NOTIFICATION In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 222 of the Constitution of India, the President, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, is pleased to transfer Shri Justice Subramonium Prasad, Additional Judge of the Madras High Court, as an Additional Judge of the Delhi High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Delhi High Court. (Raji~h~:; Joint Secretary to the Government of India Tele: 2338 3037 To The Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi.

(TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART 1 SECTION 2) No.K-13026/0 112020-US.I Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, NEW DELHI-I 10...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
நாடு முழுவதும் உள்ள நித்தியானந்தாவுக்கு சொந்தமான அசையும், அசையா சொத்துக்களின் பட்டியலை 2 வாரங்களுக்குள் தாக்கல் செய்ய சிஐடி போலீசாருக்கு ராம்நகர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்துள்ளது.

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 4, 2020

நாடு முழுவதும் உள்ள நித்தியானந்தாவுக்கு சொந்தமான அசையும், அசையா சொத்துக்களின் பட்டியலை 2 வாரங்களுக்குள் தாக்கல் செய்ய சிஐடி போலீசாருக்கு ராம்நகர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்துள்ளது.

நாடு முழுவதும் உள்ள நித்தியானந்தாவுக்கு சொந்தமான அசையும், அசையா சொத்துக்களின் பட்டியலை 2 வாரங்களுக்குள் தாக்கல் செய்ய சிஐடி போலீசாருக்கு ராம்நகர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்துள்ளது.

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version