https://www.barandbench.com/news/centre-notifies-transfer-of-justice-subramonium-prasad-to-delhi-high-court
![SC agrees to hear tomorrow Centre’s plea for hanging of those death row convicts in Nirbhaya case whose mercy pleas have been dismissed by President. [2/6, 10:49] Sekarreporter 1: 👍🏽](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story [3/4, 17:53] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 17:47] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: Very rarely an additional judge is transferred before becoming permanent!it is not the case of justice kannan who went to P&H hc.It looks as if he was originally to be appointed in Delhi HC.Since that might not have been possible he was appointed here only to be shifted by transfer mode!Madras Hc has become launching pad for many and it looks like a transit house!!It is a pity that the Bar never discusses such issues! [3/4, 17:51] Sekarreporter 1: [3/4, 18:01] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: In service law there are several methods of appointing a person to a post.They are direct recruitment (e.g.Bar),promotion(e.g.service judges).But their there is yet another source .i.e.”transfer from other service”.This method is slowly entering in to the service of higher judiciary &it is not found in the Constitution.Justice MM Ismail was appointed in Delhi High court,when that court was created for the first time[1964] .After an year he was appointed to our high court in( 1965).!! It was not an involuntary act.After 55 years there is a repeat performance in a reverse order!!!!
- Previous story (TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, PART 1 SECTION 2) No.K-13026/0 112020-US.I Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice (Department of Justice) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, NEW DELHI-I 10 011, dated 04th March, 2020. NOTIFICATION In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 222 of the Constitution of India, the President, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, is pleased to transfer Shri Justice Subramonium Prasad, Additional Judge of the Madras High Court, as an Additional Judge of the Delhi High Court and to direct him to assume charge of his office in the Delhi High Court. (Raji~h~:; Joint Secretary to the Government of India Tele: 2338 3037 To The Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi.
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
More
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
