SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: December 4, 2019

P chithambar am bail order copy

Uncategorized

P chithambar am bail order copy

[12/4, 11:40] Sekarreporter: REPORTABLE    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1831/2019) (Arising out of  S.L.P.(Criminal) No.10493 of 2019  P. Chidambaram        ….Appellant (s) Versus Directorate of Enforcement   ….  Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T   A.S. Bopanna,J.          Leave granted.        The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant assailing the final order dated 15.11.2019 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Bail Application No. 2718 of 2019 whereby the High Court declined to grant regular bail to the appellant. The genesis of the case in question lies in FIR No. RC2202017­E0011 dated 15.5.2017, registered by the CBI Page 1 of 37 [12/4, 11:40] Sekarreporter: iii) The passport ordered to be deposited by this Court in the CBI case shall remain in deposit and the appellant...

[12/4, 10:44] Sekarreporter: [12/4, 10:43] Sekarreporter: SC grants bail to former finance minister P Chidambaram in a money laundering case lodged by Enforcement Directorate in INX Media case. [12/4, 10:43] Sekarreporter: SC grants bail to former finance minister P Chidambaram in a money laundering case lodged by Enforcement Directorate in INX Media case. [12/4, 10:49] Sekarreporter: #INXMediacase: Chidambaram to execute Bailbond of Rs. 2 lakh and also produce two sureties. Chidambaram cannot leave country without permission by special judge. He should not attempt to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, holds Supreme Court.

Uncategorized

[12/4, 10:44] Sekarreporter: [12/4, 10:43] Sekarreporter: SC grants bail to former finance minister P Chidambaram in a money laundering case lodged by Enforcement Directorate in INX Media case. [12/4, 10:43] Sekarreporter: SC grants bail to former finance minister P Chidambaram in a money laundering case lodged by Enforcement Directorate in INX Media case. [12/4, 10:49] Sekarreporter: #INXMediacase: Chidambaram to execute Bailbond of Rs. 2 lakh and also produce two sureties. Chidambaram cannot leave country without permission by special judge. He should not attempt to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, holds Supreme Court.

[12/4, 10:44] Sekarreporter: [12/4, 10:43] Sekarreporter: SC grants bail to former finance minister P Chidambaram in a money laundering case lodged by Enforcement Directorate in INX Media case. [12/4, 10:43] Sekarreporter: SC grants bail...

Three days after special officer of the idol wing Pon Manickavel refused to hand over all records and details of the cases pertaining to the idol theft, the state government on Tuesday posted the 2001-batch IPS officer T.S. Anbu who is Inspector General of Police (Administration) as IGP, Idol Wing, CID, Chennai.

Uncategorized

Three days after special officer of the idol wing Pon Manickavel refused to hand over all records and details of the cases pertaining to the idol theft, the state government on Tuesday posted the 2001-batch IPS officer T.S. Anbu who is Inspector General of Police (Administration) as IGP, Idol Wing, CID, Chennai.

Chennai: Three days after special officer of the idol wing Pon Manickavel refused to hand over all records and details of the cases pertaining to the idol theft, the state government on Tuesday posted the...

Chennai: The Madras high court has held that those government servants /employees, who are freshly appointed on or after April 1, 2003, are not entitled to pension in view of proviso to Rule 2 of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 inserted by G.O dated August 6, 2003. The Full Bench comprising Justices R.Subbiah, P.T.Asha and C.Saravanan gave the ruling while answering the reference made to it on a batch of petitions and appeals from individual employees and state government. The Full bench said such reference came to be made by the division bench on noticing that there were two conflicting decisions rendered by the division benches of this court. In one of the judgments, it was held that persons who were absorbed and/or regularized to service after April 1, 2003 were not entitled to count half of the past service rendered by them for the purpose of conferment of pensionary benefits along with the service rendered by them after regularization. Another division bench held that such persons, whose service came to be regularized after April 1, 2003 were entitled and/or eligible to count half of the services rendered by them on daily wage basis prior to their regularization, for the purpose of conferment of pensionary benefits. Thus, this contrary view taken by two division bench of this court has led to the present reference to this Full bench, the Full bench added. The Full Bench held that those government servants/employees appointed prior to April 1, 2003 whether on temporary or permanent basis in terms of Rule 10 (a) (1) of Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules will be entitled to get pension as per the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. In case, a government employee/servant had also rendered service in non-provincialised service, or on consolidated pay or on honorarium or daily wage basis and if such services were regularized before April 1, 2003, half of service rendered shall be counted for the purpose of conferment of pensionary benefits, the Full Bench added. The Full Bench said those government servants who were appointed in the aforesaid four categories before the cut off date and later appointed under Rule 10 (a) (1) of Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules and absorbed into regular service after April 1, 2003 will not be entitled to count half of their past service for the purpose of determination of qualifying service for pension. Those government servants, who were appointed in the aforesaid four categories before April 1, 2003 but were absorbed in regular service after April 1, 2003 will not be entitled to count half of their past service for the purpose of determination of qualifying service for pension, the Full Bench added.

Uncategorized

Chennai: The Madras high court has held that those government servants /employees, who are freshly appointed on or after April 1, 2003, are not entitled to pension in view of proviso to Rule 2 of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 inserted by G.O dated August 6, 2003. The Full Bench comprising Justices R.Subbiah, P.T.Asha and C.Saravanan gave the ruling while answering the reference made to it on a batch of petitions and appeals from individual employees and state government. The Full bench said such reference came to be made by the division bench on noticing that there were two conflicting decisions rendered by the division benches of this court. In one of the judgments, it was held that persons who were absorbed and/or regularized to service after April 1, 2003 were not entitled to count half of the past service rendered by them for the purpose of conferment of pensionary benefits along with the service rendered by them after regularization. Another division bench held that such persons, whose service came to be regularized after April 1, 2003 were entitled and/or eligible to count half of the services rendered by them on daily wage basis prior to their regularization, for the purpose of conferment of pensionary benefits. Thus, this contrary view taken by two division bench of this court has led to the present reference to this Full bench, the Full bench added. The Full Bench held that those government servants/employees appointed prior to April 1, 2003 whether on temporary or permanent basis in terms of Rule 10 (a) (1) of Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules will be entitled to get pension as per the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. In case, a government employee/servant had also rendered service in non-provincialised service, or on consolidated pay or on honorarium or daily wage basis and if such services were regularized before April 1, 2003, half of service rendered shall be counted for the purpose of conferment of pensionary benefits, the Full Bench added. The Full Bench said those government servants who were appointed in the aforesaid four categories before the cut off date and later appointed under Rule 10 (a) (1) of Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules and absorbed into regular service after April 1, 2003 will not be entitled to count half of their past service for the purpose of determination of qualifying service for pension. Those government servants, who were appointed in the aforesaid four categories before April 1, 2003 but were absorbed in regular service after April 1, 2003 will not be entitled to count half of their past service for the purpose of determination of qualifying service for pension, the Full Bench added.

Chennai: The Madras high court has held that those government servants /employees, who are freshly appointed on or after April 1, 2003, are not entitled to pension in view of proviso to Rule 2 of...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com