2017 (5)CTC 430 ( DB ) : shinago holdings pvt ltd vs M Ethiraj : Principles laid down under order 38 rule 5 CPC would apply to application under section 9 of the arbitration and coincilation act in case for attachment before judgement

[28/10, 10:10] Vinothpandian: 2017 (5)CTC 430 ( DB ) : shinago holdings pvt ltd vs M Ethiraj : Principles laid down under order 38 rule 5 CPC would apply to application under section 9 of the arbitration and coincilation act in case for attachment before judgement
[28/10, 10:10] Vinothpandian: AIR 2004 SC 1529 : jose philip mampillil vs premier automobiles ltd : On purchasing a new car , if defects in new car not rectified amounts to deficiency of service
[28/10, 10:10] Vinothpandian: 2012 (3) CPR 15 : punjab state power corporation ltd vs gurpiar singh : Non – releasing of electricity connection without any just cause tantamount deficiency in service
[28/10, 10:10] Vinothpandian: 2014 (1) CPJ 128 ( NC ) : manager UCO bank vs santosh kumar Ray : In a proceedings before the consumer forum , a complaint against Banks official cannot be maintained if bank is not impleaded as party