![18/03, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications[18/03, 11:34] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD) No.19811 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013 K.K.C.Balaganesan /vs./ 1.The Managing Director, Tamil nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Chennai. 24.The reason I come to this conclusion is clearly elucidated in the Preamble of the Act, which postulates that the democracy requires an informed citizenries and the Act was only to provide for furnishing of certain information to the citizen,
- Previous story Wife can give complaint against husband where she reside under 498A. Click to join whats app group https://chat.whatsapp.com/FFqajHblhdkFkswaolQ5mF
Recent Posts
- In this regard, the Secretary to Government made a submission that all actions for effective administration will be completed within a period of 15 days and thereafter, further actions will be initiated for the purpose of completing works relating to Kalaimagal Sabha. In this regard, therespondents are directed to file a status report on 04th June, 2024.Page 1 of 2https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judisS.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.Jeni
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the followingterms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights andResponsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act(Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declaredto be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590,26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)23.04.2024Index : YesSpeaking orderNeutral Citation : YesJerTo
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
More
Recent Posts
- In this regard, the Secretary to Government made a submission that all actions for effective administration will be completed within a period of 15 days and thereafter, further actions will be initiated for the purpose of completing works relating to Kalaimagal Sabha. In this regard, therespondents are directed to file a status report on 04th June, 2024.Page 1 of 2https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judisS.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.Jeni
- In the result, the Writ Petitions are disposed of, on the followingterms,(i) Sections 4 and 4A of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights andResponsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act 42 of2017) are read down to restrict their operation only for the purposes of the Act(Tamilnadu Act 42 of 2017) as delineated in paragraph 15.2 supra ;(ii) The rest of the provisions of the impugned enactment are declaredto be valid.(iii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,W.M.P.Nos.4728, 8860 of 2020; 16530, 18266, 22579, 22582, 22588, 22590,26521, 26523, 27596, 27597, 28342, 28519, 28525 of 2021; 7703, 7708, 1731, 16864, 23302, 23303, 23304 of 2022; 991 and 1718 of 2023 are closed.(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)23.04.2024Index : YesSpeaking orderNeutral Citation : YesJerTo
- s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- TN govt informs #MadrasHighCourt the TN Heritage Commission (Amendment) Act, 2017 has been notified on March 1, 2024 and has come into effect from then on; the submission was made before first bench led by CJ SV Gangapurwala when a PIL on the matter came up for hearing @xpresstn
- In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner