2/28, 22:04] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: 01.03.2021 – K. Selvaraj, MHC Ad: *”Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments”* There are two avenues of Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments (Art. 368); namely: *Procedural* and *Substantiative*.

[2/28, 22:04] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: 01.03.2021 – K. Selvaraj, MHC Ad:
*”Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments”*
There are two avenues of Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments (Art. 368); namely: *Procedural* and *Substantiative*.

*PROCEDURAL*
1) That it has not been passed by the Special Majority provided in Article 368.
[1951 (2) MLJ 683 (SC) || AIR 1951 SC 458]
Sankari Prasad Singh Deo Vs. UOI

The said decision was overruled in _Golak Nath Vs. State of Punjab_ [AIR 1967 SC 1643], since it also held that by amending power, Parliament can amend any provisions, including Fundamental Rights and Article 368 itself. The decision in Golak Nath’s case was overruled in Kesavanandha Barathi Case, since it held that Fundamental Rights in Part III cannot be amended.

(To be continued)
[3/1, 06:43] Sekarreporter1: ☘️