Follow:
- Next story Having noted that the petitioner’s right to speedy trial has been infringed, I cannot wring my hands in despair,” observed the Madras High Court recently while directing the Narcotics Control Bureau (prosecution) to pay a compensation of Rs. 1 lakh to the Petitioner-accused. While hearing the bail application of one M. Ananthan, booked under the NDPS Act for possession of prohibited quantities of contraband, a Single Bench of Justice GR Swaminathan called out the prosecution, i.e., the Narcotics Control Bureau for causing inordinate in the Petitioner’s trial.
- Previous story [2/17, 13:50] Sekarreporter1: CJ’s Bench says it may not be appropriate to hear the case when elections are round the corner. Adjourns it to June. https://t.co/oe2PCrCi9a [2/17, 13:50] Sekarreporter1: Municipal Administration Minister SP Velumani engages senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi to represent him in cases filed in Madras HC accusing him & others of massive irregularities in award of tenders by Chennai & Coimbatore corporations. Counsel insists on closing d case. https://t.co/YVtaATEPdA
Recent Posts
- கட்டாய கல்வி உரிமைச் சட்டத்தின் கீழ் மாணவர்களுக்கு கட்டணம் செலுத்த தனியார் பள்ளிகளுக்கு 876 கோடியை விடுவித்தது தமிழக அரசு
- கட்டாயக் கல்வி சட்டத்தின் படி தமிழக பள்ளிகளில் பயின்று வரும் 25 சதவீத ஏழை மாணவர்களின் கல்வி கட்டணத்தை மத்திய அரசு 4 ஆண்டுகள் விடுவிக்காமல், கடந்த இரண்டு 2 மாதத்திற்கு முன்பு, 2 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு மட்டுமே விடுவித்தது. அந்த தொகையானது 2021 -2022, மற்றும் 2022 -2023 கல்வி ஆண்டிற்கு உரியது. ஏழை எளிய மாணவர்களின் கல்வி கற்றல் பாதிக்கக் கூடாது என்ற உயரிய எண்ணத்தில், தாயுள்ளம் கொண்ட நம் தமிழக முதல்வர் அவர்கள், உரிய காலத்தில் மேற்கண்ட இரண்டு கல்வி ஆண்டிற்கான நிதியை மாநில நிதியில் இருந்து வழங்கி விட்டார்கள்.
- Judge:* Justice C. Saravanan – *Case:* J. Deepa vs. Income Tax Department & Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: S.L. Sudharsan, Advocate – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court allowed J. Deepak, the son of J. Jayalalithaa, to be impleaded as a petitioner in the case. The court also noted that J. Deepak had paid the instalments for October and November and was willing to pay the remaining amount. *Key Points:*
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* Prashanth vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: P.S. Raman, Advocate General, Tamil Nadu – *Court Observation:* The Tamil Nadu government informed the Madras High Court that the process of accurately measuring the Pallikaranai wetland using satellite technology is 99% complete. The court had earlier directed the government to measure the wetland and had imposed an interim stay on construction activities in the area. *Key Points:* – The court is considering a petition seeking to cancel the permission granted for a multi-storey residential complex in the Pallikaranai wetland. – The petitioner has also sought a ban on construction activities within a 1 km radius of the wetland. – The government has been directed to file a status report on the measurement process. – The court has sought to know the outcome of the measurement exercise and the steps taken to protect the wetland [1][2][3].
- Email Assistance*: Victims can send an email to the Secretary of the Legal Service Authority with case details and request that the property be couriered to them in its current condition. – *Verification Process*: The Secretary will inform the investigating officer, who will verify the victim’s identity through a phone call and a short video confirmation. – *Courier Service*: Once verified, the property will be couriered to the victim’s address under the Secretary’s supervision. The court aims to reduce the burden on citizens and the judicial system, as many people don’t claim their stolen phones due to the hassle and cost involved. The funds for courier expenses will be provided by the Legal Services Authority and can be reimbursed by the State of Tamil Nadu. [04/12, 09:06] Meta AI: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy – *Case:* Suo Motu vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:*
More
Recent Posts
- கட்டாய கல்வி உரிமைச் சட்டத்தின் கீழ் மாணவர்களுக்கு கட்டணம் செலுத்த தனியார் பள்ளிகளுக்கு 876 கோடியை விடுவித்தது தமிழக அரசு
- கட்டாயக் கல்வி சட்டத்தின் படி தமிழக பள்ளிகளில் பயின்று வரும் 25 சதவீத ஏழை மாணவர்களின் கல்வி கட்டணத்தை மத்திய அரசு 4 ஆண்டுகள் விடுவிக்காமல், கடந்த இரண்டு 2 மாதத்திற்கு முன்பு, 2 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு மட்டுமே விடுவித்தது. அந்த தொகையானது 2021 -2022, மற்றும் 2022 -2023 கல்வி ஆண்டிற்கு உரியது. ஏழை எளிய மாணவர்களின் கல்வி கற்றல் பாதிக்கக் கூடாது என்ற உயரிய எண்ணத்தில், தாயுள்ளம் கொண்ட நம் தமிழக முதல்வர் அவர்கள், உரிய காலத்தில் மேற்கண்ட இரண்டு கல்வி ஆண்டிற்கான நிதியை மாநில நிதியில் இருந்து வழங்கி விட்டார்கள்.
- Judge:* Justice C. Saravanan – *Case:* J. Deepa vs. Income Tax Department & Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: S.L. Sudharsan, Advocate – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court allowed J. Deepak, the son of J. Jayalalithaa, to be impleaded as a petitioner in the case. The court also noted that J. Deepak had paid the instalments for October and November and was willing to pay the remaining amount. *Key Points:*
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* Prashanth vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: P.S. Raman, Advocate General, Tamil Nadu – *Court Observation:* The Tamil Nadu government informed the Madras High Court that the process of accurately measuring the Pallikaranai wetland using satellite technology is 99% complete. The court had earlier directed the government to measure the wetland and had imposed an interim stay on construction activities in the area. *Key Points:* – The court is considering a petition seeking to cancel the permission granted for a multi-storey residential complex in the Pallikaranai wetland. – The petitioner has also sought a ban on construction activities within a 1 km radius of the wetland. – The government has been directed to file a status report on the measurement process. – The court has sought to know the outcome of the measurement exercise and the steps taken to protect the wetland [1][2][3].
- Email Assistance*: Victims can send an email to the Secretary of the Legal Service Authority with case details and request that the property be couriered to them in its current condition. – *Verification Process*: The Secretary will inform the investigating officer, who will verify the victim’s identity through a phone call and a short video confirmation. – *Courier Service*: Once verified, the property will be couriered to the victim’s address under the Secretary’s supervision. The court aims to reduce the burden on citizens and the judicial system, as many people don’t claim their stolen phones due to the hassle and cost involved. The funds for courier expenses will be provided by the Legal Services Authority and can be reimbursed by the State of Tamil Nadu. [04/12, 09:06] Meta AI: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy – *Case:* Suo Motu vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:*