![[2/8, 10:39] sekarreporter1: சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளையில் நீதிபதிகள் டி.கிருஷ்ணகுமார் மற்றும் விக்டோரியா கவுரி ஆகியோர் கொண்ட டிவிஷன் பெஞ்ச் today முதல் செயல்படும் என அறிவிப்பு இந்த பென்ச் பொதுநல வழக்குகள், ரிட் மனுக்கள், ரிட் மேல்முறையீடுகள், குற்றவியல் அவமதிப்பு வழக்குகளை விசாரிக்கும் [2/8, 10:39] sekarreporter1: .](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN C.M.P.No.6514 of 2020 in Tr.C.M.P.No.942 of 2019 ——-It is very saddening to note that it is a shame on the part of an Advocate to refuse to vacate the premises, when a landlord requires it and the Advocates are referred to as gentleman in the preamble to Chapter-II of the Bar Council of India Rules under Section 49(1)(c) of the Act read with the proviso thereto. In the present case on hand, the petitioner / Tenant has proved himself to be a wicked, dishonest and unprincipled person. It is directed that the matter shall be handled only by Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar, learned counsel for Bar Council / R2 and he shall not be displaced by anyone from the Panel till a final decision is taken on the enquiry against the petitioner. As the time limit is fixed under the Advocates Act, the Bar Council must ensure that the papers are not misplaced, so as to later contend that the time has already been over and no action can be taken against the petitioner herein. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to MHAA, MBA and Women Lawyers’ Association to inform the members of the respective Associations that they should not defend a dishonest Tenant, who happens to be a deceitful Advocate, like the petitioner herein, who is not a gentleman, in order to safeguard the reputation of this profession. An Advocate, who happens to be a tenant, should be a gentleman and shall vacate the premises within 30 days, if request is made by the landlord. If that happens, a Lawyer will get a house on rent even without a written agreement. Some of the Advocates are now-a-days looked at as Rowdies and third rate criminals by public by the conduct of similar to the one of the tenant in this case. It is painful to say that many of the Advocates are involved in the land grabbing and if the antecedent of the petitioner / S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., jrs/ar tenant is verified, he may also be one of the land grabbers. The tenant has scant regard for the orders of the Court and he has portrayed sadistic attitude.
- Previous story The writ petitions filed by DMK principal secretary K.N. Nehru & MNM leader AG Mourya for conducting grama sabha meetings came for hearing before the First Bench. Vijayan Subramanian counsel for MNM submitted that writ petition was filed questioning the cancelation of grama dabha meetings all over TN on Oct
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
- Case quashed against Big boss darsan advocate Thenmoli
- JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Criminal Appeal Nos.1128 of 2022 and 255 of 2023 and Crl. M.P. No.19507 of 2023 Sanjana … Appellant in Crl.A. No.1128/2022/A2 Balaji … Appellant in Crl.A. No.255/2023/A1 Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, W-25, All Women Police Station, T. Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.6/2019) .. Respondent in both the appeals
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.1664 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.20268 of 2023 — State Represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sooramangalam Range, Karuppur Police Station, Salem City,
More
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
- Case quashed against Big boss darsan advocate Thenmoli
- JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Criminal Appeal Nos.1128 of 2022 and 255 of 2023 and Crl. M.P. No.19507 of 2023 Sanjana … Appellant in Crl.A. No.1128/2022/A2 Balaji … Appellant in Crl.A. No.255/2023/A1 Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police, W-25, All Women Police Station, T. Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.6/2019) .. Respondent in both the appeals
- THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.A.No.1664 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.20268 of 2023 — State Represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sooramangalam Range, Karuppur Police Station, Salem City,
