Follow:
- Next story The Madras High Court had delivered a verdict in October saying the Metro Rail comes under the purview of the State government, and its employees are naturally covered by the State Labour Acts. Hence, they are eligible to the statutory nine months’ maternity leave.
- Previous story Pendency of Representation Filed by Assessee not a bar to issuing Pre-revision Notices by Department: Madras HC bench Dr Justice Anita Sumanth setting aside the pre-revision notices relied upon the admission by the Department wherein the Department admits that the purpose of pre-revision notices is held as not for implementing Enforcement Wing proposals but for putting forth issues that arise from the returns of turnover filed by a dealer to the dealer for response and rebuttal, making them of a routine nature contrary to framing of assessments wherein the Authority has to apply his mind to the issues that arise from the return of turnover filed by dealer/assessee.
Recent Posts
- Centre notifies ‘rules’ under four labour codes: 1. Code on Wages (Central) Rules, 2026. 2. Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026.
- Tangedco and its former Finance Controller V. Kasi had filed appeals before the Supreme Court against #MadrasHighCourt order for a CBI probe in the alleged ₹397 crore transformer procurement scam. These appeals have been listed for hearing before Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta today. @THChennai Backgrounder 👇
- Supreme Court recently asked ten States and three Union Territories to show whether they have implemented Section 12(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education(RTE) Act, 2009. On the failure to show the faithful implementation of Section 12(1)(c), the Court will be compelled to summon the Principal Secretaries of the Education Department of the said States/UTs.
- Madras HC: Teacher’s disciplinary action ≠ criminal act under POCSO* *Justice S.M. Subramaniam | LiveLaw report*
- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR WP No. 19287 of 2026 and WMP Nos. 20543 & 20544 of 2026 KR.Periakaruppan S/o.AL.Karuthan Door No.252,Aralikottai Village Singampunari Taluk
More
Recent Posts
- Centre notifies ‘rules’ under four labour codes: 1. Code on Wages (Central) Rules, 2026. 2. Social Security (Central) Rules, 2026.
- Tangedco and its former Finance Controller V. Kasi had filed appeals before the Supreme Court against #MadrasHighCourt order for a CBI probe in the alleged ₹397 crore transformer procurement scam. These appeals have been listed for hearing before Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta today. @THChennai Backgrounder 👇
- Supreme Court recently asked ten States and three Union Territories to show whether they have implemented Section 12(1)(c) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education(RTE) Act, 2009. On the failure to show the faithful implementation of Section 12(1)(c), the Court will be compelled to summon the Principal Secretaries of the Education Department of the said States/UTs.
- Madras HC: Teacher’s disciplinary action ≠ criminal act under POCSO* *Justice S.M. Subramaniam | LiveLaw report*
- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR WP No. 19287 of 2026 and WMP Nos. 20543 & 20544 of 2026 KR.Periakaruppan S/o.AL.Karuthan Door No.252,Aralikottai Village Singampunari Taluk