![[12/10, 15:14] Sekarreporter1: #BREAKING | திமுக தலைவர் மு.க ஸ்டாலின் மீது தமிழக அரசு தொடர்ந்த 4 அவதூறு வழக்குகளை ரத்து செய்து சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு #SunNews | @EPSTamilNadu | @mkstalin [12/10, 15:14] Sekarreporter1: Advt kumaresan](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story The Madras High Court had delivered a verdict in October saying the Metro Rail comes under the purview of the State government, and its employees are naturally covered by the State Labour Acts. Hence, they are eligible to the statutory nine months’ maternity leave.
- Previous story Pendency of Representation Filed by Assessee not a bar to issuing Pre-revision Notices by Department: Madras HC bench Dr Justice Anita Sumanth setting aside the pre-revision notices relied upon the admission by the Department wherein the Department admits that the purpose of pre-revision notices is held as not for implementing Enforcement Wing proposals but for putting forth issues that arise from the returns of turnover filed by a dealer to the dealer for response and rebuttal, making them of a routine nature contrary to framing of assessments wherein the Authority has to apply his mind to the issues that arise from the return of turnover filed by dealer/assessee.
Recent Posts
- Madas high court sep 28th order judge durai samy took new post tribunal
- Bike race case ab Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1575079129904336897?t=gjdIgWk5rSxmlWT-lB-gkg&s=08 [9/28, 16:35] Sekarreporter1: Crl.O.P.No.22678 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 308 of IPC r/w 128, 177, 184, 188 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 in Crime No.215 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant one
- Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1574988525891907585?t=IdTfIJbIApNe9sQ6ccMkAA&s=08 [9/28, 10:35] Sekarreporter1: [9/28, 10:21] Sekarreporter1: Justice AD Jagadish Chandira of Madras HC grants bail to Pachaiyappa’s College student who claimed to be ‘route thala’ & threatened train passengers by brandishing a knife and stones. Directs him to serve inmates of Mithra rehabilitation centre. @
- https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1574687207809773569?t=1spQJI6OKasdEhpTW0TRbg&s=08 [9/27, 14:39] Sekarreporter1: BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 13.04.2022 PRNOUNCED ON : 26.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W. P.(MD)Nos.23360 of 2016 and 3718 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.16787 of 2016, 2981 and 3054 of 2017
- 27, 06:45] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1574568267607592960?s=08 [9/27, 06:45] Sekarreporter1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 19.09.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 23.09.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.53 of 2002 M.Mahadevan alias Mahadevaiah .. Appellant Versus
More
Recent Posts
- Madas high court sep 28th order judge durai samy took new post tribunal
- Bike race case ab Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1575079129904336897?t=gjdIgWk5rSxmlWT-lB-gkg&s=08 [9/28, 16:35] Sekarreporter1: Crl.O.P.No.22678 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 279 and 308 of IPC r/w 128, 177, 184, 188 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 in Crime No.215 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant one
- Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1574988525891907585?t=IdTfIJbIApNe9sQ6ccMkAA&s=08 [9/28, 10:35] Sekarreporter1: [9/28, 10:21] Sekarreporter1: Justice AD Jagadish Chandira of Madras HC grants bail to Pachaiyappa’s College student who claimed to be ‘route thala’ & threatened train passengers by brandishing a knife and stones. Directs him to serve inmates of Mithra rehabilitation centre. @
- https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1574687207809773569?t=1spQJI6OKasdEhpTW0TRbg&s=08 [9/27, 14:39] Sekarreporter1: BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 13.04.2022 PRNOUNCED ON : 26.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W. P.(MD)Nos.23360 of 2016 and 3718 of 2017and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.16787 of 2016, 2981 and 3054 of 2017
- 27, 06:45] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1574568267607592960?s=08 [9/27, 06:45] Sekarreporter1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 19.09.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 23.09.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.53 of 2002 M.Mahadevan alias Mahadevaiah .. Appellant Versus
