You may also like...
-
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY In view of the above answers, I am in agreement with the findings of the Trial Court in respect of all the five issues framed and this Appeal Suit is without any merit. Appeal Suit No. 1267 of 2003 1. Hari Ohm Estates repd. by Partner, C Subramaniam. For Appellants : M/s J.R.K. Bhavanantham For Respondents : M/s V. Gangatharan (for R1 & R4) : M/s. P.B. Ramanjujam (for R3) : M/s. P. Veena Suresh (for R10) : R6 – DIED. : Notice served (R2, 5, 7, 8, 9) JUDGMENT
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 8, 2023
-
The nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Monday said that it will consider re-framing the issues on essential religious practices, interplay between faith and fundamental rights, and extent of judicial review on religious practices which were referred in the Sabarimala review order passed by a 5-judge bench on November 14, 2019. The CJ-led bench has asked the Secretary General of the Supreme Court to convene a meeting of all lawyers involved in the case on January 17 for this purpose. The meeting will decide the points of : 1. Reframing or addition of issues. 2. Allocation of issues among lawyers. 3. Division of time between lawyers. The bench comprises CJI S A Bobde, Justice R Banumathi, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice L Nageswara Rao, Justice Mohan M Shantanagoudar, Justice S Abdul Nazeer, Justice R Subhash Reddy, Justice B R Gavai and Justice Surya Kant.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 13, 2020
-