[12/19, 18:01] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1340273422610251778?s=08 [12/19, 18:01] Sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/what-makes-litigants-think-they-can-miss-court-appointments-madras-high-court

by Sekar Reporter · December 19, 2020

[12/19, 18:01] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1340273422610251778?s=08
[12/19, 18:01] Sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/what-makes-litigants-think-they-can-miss-court-appointments-madras-high-court

You may also like...

• 

  CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.A.Nos.2088 and 2043 of 2021, W.P.Nos.21901 and 22226 of 2019, 13308 & 13324 of 2020 and sweaper post caae

  December 25, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 25, 2021

• 

  [12/6, 15:48] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1202894733418188801?s=08 [12/6, 15:48] Sekarreporter: சிலை கடத்தல் வழக்கில் சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் தடை விதித்ததால் எந்த உத்தரவும் பிறப்பிக்க முடியாது ஐகோர்ட் கருத்து https://t.co/hqiadLkzIV

  December 6, 2019

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 6, 2019

• 

  justices M Sathyanarayanan and P Rajamanickam stated that the litigant has not submitted any materials to support his claim that only a Kallar community member should have been appointed in the above post. They also pointed out that it is a service portfolio case and not a PIL and the litigant, despite being a practising advocate and a registered political party member, had not paid attention to the fact. Criticising the litigant for wasting the court’s time, the judge dismissed the PIL and directed the litigant to pay Rs 10,000 as cost to any one Kallar Reclamation school of his choice within two weeks.

  September 1, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 1, 2020