Follow:
- Next story Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1336988347508510721?s=08 [12/10, 16:27] Sekarreporter1: [12/10, 16:02] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: Legal Eagle Elites is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: Special Session On International Human Rights Day Resource Person: R. Amizhdhu, Advocate, High Court Madras Date: 10-12-2020 ( Thursday )
- Previous story Vinothpandian: 1985 (4) SCC 80 : pattipati venkaiah vs state of Andhra pradesh : medical science is not yet so perfect as to determine the exact time of death , nor can be the same be determined in a computerised
Recent Posts
- ORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.No.17707 of 2026 Yuvaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by. The Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. ..Respondent
- Accordingly, the criminal original petition stands allowed. The final report in C.C.No.28 of 2026, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Dharapuram, is hereby quashed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
- Today meeting /Law Minister’s Advice to Newly Appointed Govt Lawyers*
- Madras HC held that benefit under GST Amnesty Scheme Section 128A cannot be refused to an assessee merely because there is a larger/earlier ruling on the issue*
- Case #256: _ED Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts on Mere Suspicion – “Reasons to Believe” Mandatory*_ *Court*: _Supreme Court of India_
More
Recent Posts
- ORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.No.17707 of 2026 Yuvaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by. The Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai. ..Respondent
- Accordingly, the criminal original petition stands allowed. The final report in C.C.No.28 of 2026, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Dharapuram, is hereby quashed. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
- Today meeting /Law Minister’s Advice to Newly Appointed Govt Lawyers*
- Madras HC held that benefit under GST Amnesty Scheme Section 128A cannot be refused to an assessee merely because there is a larger/earlier ruling on the issue*
- Case #256: _ED Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts on Mere Suspicion – “Reasons to Believe” Mandatory*_ *Court*: _Supreme Court of India_