You may also like...
-
[2/5, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1225004910858498048?s=08 [2/5, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: தயாரிப்பாளர் சங்கத்துக்கு புதிய சிறப்பு அதிகாரி நியமனம் – அரசாணை பிறப்பித்துள்ளதாக தமிழக அரசு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் தகவல் #HighCourt aag Aravinth Pandian informed court case adj https://t.co/HAvqgAwl8i [2/5, 16:05] Sekarreporter 1: Judge Senthil kumar
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 5, 2020
-
Justice M Dhandapani said that petitioner L Nagaraj worked as assistant executive engineer in the department for more than 33 years and retired without any blemish. Hence, the charge memo issued against him after his retirement is unsustainable. He was working in Tangedco at Pugalur in Trichy district and retired from service on June 30, 2014. After the petitioner’s retirement, there was a family dispute between the petitioner and his second son-in-law Vijaya Kumar.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 22, 2021
-
Whether in the absence of affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties on addressing the framed substantial questions of law, the High Court could have proceeded to decide the same in an appeal preferred under section 100 Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter “CPC”), particularly, when the findings of fact rendered by two Courts, were sought to be reversed?
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 25, 2023