[1/1, 14:20] Sekarreporter1: பதவியேற்பு [1/1, 14:20] Sekarreporter1: Monday 9.30 AM [1/1, 14:20] Sekarreporter1: New cj MHC

by Sekar Reporter · January 1, 2021

[1/1, 14:20] Sekarreporter1: பதவியேற்பு
[1/1, 14:20] Sekarreporter1: Monday 9.30 AM
[1/1, 14:20] Sekarreporter1: New cj MHC

You may also like...

• 

  Case allowed. this Court is of the view that, the impugned order, discharging 778 students from MBBS course, that too, after completion of their first year, by totally carried away by the complaint made by the PUT, without analyzing the HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY batch case. for Petitioners in W.P.No.25062/2017 : Mr.N.L.Rajah, Senior Counsel for Mr.Arun Anbumani. Counsel for Petitioners in W.P.No.25066/17 & 17015/18 :Mr.P.H.Aravind Pandian, Senior Counsel for Mr.C.V.Shailandran

  May 1, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published May 1, 2022

• 

  2.It is the case of the petitioner that her marriage with the 3rd respondent was solemnized on 12.10.2022 without her consent in the 2nd respondent Church therefore, the same should not be registered.  I do not think such a mandamus could be issued.  Once the marriage is solemnized, de hors registration, is by itself valid. It can be dissolved only by a decree of Court.  The Registration by itself does not add to the sanctity of the marriage, which according to the petitioner was done without her consent. 3.Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court or the appropriate forum seeking a declaration that the marriage is invalid.  No costs. 05.12.2022 kkn Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. KKN To:- 1.The Inspector General of Registration,    No.100, Santhome High Road,    Chennai – 28. W.P.No.32582 of 2022 05.12.2022. For Petitioner     : Mr.M.Pandian                                  For Respondents       : Mr.M.Muthusamy   Government Advocate for R1 O R D E R The prayer in the Writ Petition reads as follows:directing the 1st respondent not to register the marriage which was solemnized on 12.11.2022 before the 2nd respondent church without the petitioner’s consent to the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 28.10.2022 and dispose of the same within the time limit that may be stipulated.

  December 18, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 18, 2022

• 

  Vending of liquor is an obnoxious trade, says Chief Justice SahiChief Justice Amreshwar Pratap Sahi has held. However, after finding that the law does not prohibit locating of liquor shops on agricultural lands, the Bench, also comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad, said the shops could be established in buildings constructed on agricultural lands after ascertaining whether all necessary approvals had been obtained. The orders were passed on a writ petition filed by Mallasamy Nachimuthu, a resident of Mylambadi village in Bhavani Taluk of Erode district to close down a liquor shop established on an agricultural land. The land owner’s counsel Naveen Kumar Murthi opposed the plea citing the absence of any such legal bar.

  December 14, 2019

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 14, 2019