You may also like...
-
Temple land casemhc bench refuse to stay judge mahadevan order bench PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Learned Additional Advocate General has taken this Court through the conclusions/ final directions recorded by learned single Judge, more particularly contained in para 22 of the impugned order. T.Kokilavane, learned advocate accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent in W.A.No.64 of 2022 and for the fourth respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.V.B.R.Menon, learned advocate accepts notice for the first respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and Mr.A.Radhakrishnan, party-in-person, appears for the first respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader (H.R. & C.E.) accepts notice on behalf of respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.64 of 2022, second respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and for respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.74 of 2022.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 30, 2022
-
Justice Anita Sumanth observed that, “the amounts paid by the employer to the employee for premature termination of a contract/notice pay recovery of employment are treatable as amounts paid in relation to services provided by the employee to the employer in the course of employment. Hence, amounts so paid would be chargeable to service tax”.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 30, 2020
-