Follow:
- Next story Sc vrsj வக்கீல் தொழிலில் தொழில் தர்மம் என்ற வார்த்தையைப் புரிந்து கொள்வது சிக்கலானது. இந்த தொழிலைப் பொருத்தவரை உங்களிடம் வரும் வழக்காடிகளின் பக்கம் இருக்கும் நியாயத்தை மட்டும் எடுத்துக் கூறுவதே தொழில் தருமம. வழக்கில் வெற்றிப் பெறுவது மட்டுமே தொழில் தர்மம் இல்லை என்பதை முதலில் புரிந்து கொள்ள வேண்டும். வழக்கடிகள் தரப்பில் கருப்பு மற்றும் வெள்ளை பக்கங்களை இருக்கும். அதை உணர்த்தவே வக்கீல்கள் கருப்பு வெள்ளை ஆடைகளை அணிகின்றனர். எனவே உண்மையைச் சொன்னால் வெற்றி கிடைக்காது என்ற நம்பிக்கையை உடைத்தெறிய வேண்டும்.
- Previous story [2/2, 08:06] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1223797093426290688?s=08 [2/2, 08:06] Sekarreporter 1: Chief Justice Sahi, in his special address, said personal behaviour, maintaining a high ethical standard, and exhibiting a strong character were some of the primal facets which had to be observed by every lawyer. “I say this, that in contemporary times, even though it still remains the noble profession, law is looked up with respect, but unfortunately, at times, in public opinion, lawyers are suspects,” he pointed out. Urging lawyers to improve upon such opinions by their professional conduct, he said their intellect should be guided more by common sense, logic and applicability of law to life, rather than prowess of superior intelligence, that might lead only to theoretical heights without pragmatic results. “Your job is the most difficult in the world, and that is the art of persuading the human mind to believe that whatever you are saying is the best.” “Today’s society, as civilized as it is today, is still strewn with strife, where tensions mount high due to rival thoughts — be it the issue of thickness of a pin or the width of the galaxies. A lawyer, therefore, has to train himself and his mind to keep within the confines of the cause, but at the same time, not let his imagination be curtailed, as a petty problem today might become a universal problem tomorrow.” “Illustrations are not far to see whether the throwing of a paper on the roadside is only a petty nuisance or the dumping of nuclear garbage in the seas is a far greater threat to humanity. Lawyers and members of the legal profession, in whatever field they are, their devotion of thought process has to travel the entire horizon, conquer mirages, and at times, even travel into the unknown,” he said. The university’s vice-chancellor, T.S.N. Sastry, also spoke.
Recent Posts
- கட்டாய கல்வி உரிமைச் சட்டத்தின் கீழ் மாணவர்களுக்கு கட்டணம் செலுத்த தனியார் பள்ளிகளுக்கு 876 கோடியை விடுவித்தது தமிழக அரசு
- கட்டாயக் கல்வி சட்டத்தின் படி தமிழக பள்ளிகளில் பயின்று வரும் 25 சதவீத ஏழை மாணவர்களின் கல்வி கட்டணத்தை மத்திய அரசு 4 ஆண்டுகள் விடுவிக்காமல், கடந்த இரண்டு 2 மாதத்திற்கு முன்பு, 2 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு மட்டுமே விடுவித்தது. அந்த தொகையானது 2021 -2022, மற்றும் 2022 -2023 கல்வி ஆண்டிற்கு உரியது. ஏழை எளிய மாணவர்களின் கல்வி கற்றல் பாதிக்கக் கூடாது என்ற உயரிய எண்ணத்தில், தாயுள்ளம் கொண்ட நம் தமிழக முதல்வர் அவர்கள், உரிய காலத்தில் மேற்கண்ட இரண்டு கல்வி ஆண்டிற்கான நிதியை மாநில நிதியில் இருந்து வழங்கி விட்டார்கள்.
- Judge:* Justice C. Saravanan – *Case:* J. Deepa vs. Income Tax Department & Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: S.L. Sudharsan, Advocate – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court allowed J. Deepak, the son of J. Jayalalithaa, to be impleaded as a petitioner in the case. The court also noted that J. Deepak had paid the instalments for October and November and was willing to pay the remaining amount. *Key Points:*
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* Prashanth vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: P.S. Raman, Advocate General, Tamil Nadu – *Court Observation:* The Tamil Nadu government informed the Madras High Court that the process of accurately measuring the Pallikaranai wetland using satellite technology is 99% complete. The court had earlier directed the government to measure the wetland and had imposed an interim stay on construction activities in the area. *Key Points:* – The court is considering a petition seeking to cancel the permission granted for a multi-storey residential complex in the Pallikaranai wetland. – The petitioner has also sought a ban on construction activities within a 1 km radius of the wetland. – The government has been directed to file a status report on the measurement process. – The court has sought to know the outcome of the measurement exercise and the steps taken to protect the wetland [1][2][3].
- Email Assistance*: Victims can send an email to the Secretary of the Legal Service Authority with case details and request that the property be couriered to them in its current condition. – *Verification Process*: The Secretary will inform the investigating officer, who will verify the victim’s identity through a phone call and a short video confirmation. – *Courier Service*: Once verified, the property will be couriered to the victim’s address under the Secretary’s supervision. The court aims to reduce the burden on citizens and the judicial system, as many people don’t claim their stolen phones due to the hassle and cost involved. The funds for courier expenses will be provided by the Legal Services Authority and can be reimbursed by the State of Tamil Nadu. [04/12, 09:06] Meta AI: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy – *Case:* Suo Motu vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:*
More
Recent Posts
- கட்டாய கல்வி உரிமைச் சட்டத்தின் கீழ் மாணவர்களுக்கு கட்டணம் செலுத்த தனியார் பள்ளிகளுக்கு 876 கோடியை விடுவித்தது தமிழக அரசு
- கட்டாயக் கல்வி சட்டத்தின் படி தமிழக பள்ளிகளில் பயின்று வரும் 25 சதவீத ஏழை மாணவர்களின் கல்வி கட்டணத்தை மத்திய அரசு 4 ஆண்டுகள் விடுவிக்காமல், கடந்த இரண்டு 2 மாதத்திற்கு முன்பு, 2 ஆண்டுகளுக்கு மட்டுமே விடுவித்தது. அந்த தொகையானது 2021 -2022, மற்றும் 2022 -2023 கல்வி ஆண்டிற்கு உரியது. ஏழை எளிய மாணவர்களின் கல்வி கற்றல் பாதிக்கக் கூடாது என்ற உயரிய எண்ணத்தில், தாயுள்ளம் கொண்ட நம் தமிழக முதல்வர் அவர்கள், உரிய காலத்தில் மேற்கண்ட இரண்டு கல்வி ஆண்டிற்கான நிதியை மாநில நிதியில் இருந்து வழங்கி விட்டார்கள்.
- Judge:* Justice C. Saravanan – *Case:* J. Deepa vs. Income Tax Department & Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: S.L. Sudharsan, Advocate – Respondent: Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court allowed J. Deepak, the son of J. Jayalalithaa, to be impleaded as a petitioner in the case. The court also noted that J. Deepak had paid the instalments for October and November and was willing to pay the remaining amount. *Key Points:*
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Case:* Prashanth vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: P.S. Raman, Advocate General, Tamil Nadu – *Court Observation:* The Tamil Nadu government informed the Madras High Court that the process of accurately measuring the Pallikaranai wetland using satellite technology is 99% complete. The court had earlier directed the government to measure the wetland and had imposed an interim stay on construction activities in the area. *Key Points:* – The court is considering a petition seeking to cancel the permission granted for a multi-storey residential complex in the Pallikaranai wetland. – The petitioner has also sought a ban on construction activities within a 1 km radius of the wetland. – The government has been directed to file a status report on the measurement process. – The court has sought to know the outcome of the measurement exercise and the steps taken to protect the wetland [1][2][3].
- Email Assistance*: Victims can send an email to the Secretary of the Legal Service Authority with case details and request that the property be couriered to them in its current condition. – *Verification Process*: The Secretary will inform the investigating officer, who will verify the victim’s identity through a phone call and a short video confirmation. – *Courier Service*: Once verified, the property will be couriered to the victim’s address under the Secretary’s supervision. The court aims to reduce the burden on citizens and the judicial system, as many people don’t claim their stolen phones due to the hassle and cost involved. The funds for courier expenses will be provided by the Legal Services Authority and can be reimbursed by the State of Tamil Nadu. [04/12, 09:06] Meta AI: *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy – *Case:* Suo Motu vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Others – *Counsel:*