பிரதமர் மோடி உலகளவில் சிந்தித்து உள்நாட்டில் செயல்படும் பல்துறை மேதை : சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் நீதிபதி… https://t.co/wHlQSGapIk #PMModi
பிரதமர் மோடி உலகளவில் சிந்தித்து உள்நாட்டில் செயல்படும் பல்துறை மேதை : சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் நீதிபதி…
PMModi
Follow:
- Next story சட்டமே உயர்ந்தது. மக்கள் நீதித்துறை மீது பெரிதும் நம்பிக்கை வைத்துள்ளனர்
- Previous story Legal declamation in madurai
Recent Posts
- Hon’ble Supreme Court has refused the plea to extend the deadline for uploading Waqf property details on the UMEED Portal, reaffirming that 5 December 2025 remains the final date. As Minister of Minority Affairs, I have received several requests from Waqf Boards and stakeholders seeking an extension. For any grievance or issue related to Waqf properties, the UMEED Act provides a clear remedial mechanism, stakeholders may approach the Waqf Tribunal as prescribed under the law. The Ministry remains committed to transparency, accountability, and strengthening Waqf management across the country.
- *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers vs. Ilaiyaraaja – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja vs. Mythri Movie Makers and 2 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Mythri Movie Makers: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – Respondents: M/s. Jidesh Kumar, Navod Prasannan, Vijay R Sekar, Akalya Ravichandran, G. Lakshmi Prathista Reddy, RV. Che Guvera, Dhakshin Kumar – *Court Observation:* The case is listed for pronouncing orders.
- National Green Tribunal (NGT)* – *Bench:* Not specified – *Parties:* J. Brezhnev vs. Union Ministry of Environment and 7 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: M/s. S. Tamil Selvan, R.S. Selva, P. Praveen, Samadhanam S. Prasath – Respondents: – R1: M/s. Dr. G. Babu (CG SR PC) – R2: A. Edwin Prabhakar (State Govt. Pleader) – R3: Smt. P. Veena Suresh (Standing Counsel) – R4-R7: K. Karthik Jagannath (Govt.) – *Court Observation:* The case is listed with appearances from various counsel for the respondents.
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Parties:* Rangarajan Narasimhan vs. The State – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: Additional Government Advocate Rajtilak – *Court Observation:* The court directed the police to respond within 3 weeks to a petition seeking a special investigation team probe into an alleged attempt to steal a gold lizard idol from the Kancheepuram Varadaraja Perumal Temple.
- Madras High Court (Madurai Bench)* – *Judge:* Justice K. Kumaresh Babu – *Parties:* [Not specified in the news report] ( likely the family of the deceased vs. Tangedco) – *Date of Order:* December 2, 2025 – *Counsel:* Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court directed Tangedco to pay ₹20 lakh as compensation to the family of a man who was electrocuted while working on an electric pole installation without proper authorization. The court noted that a Tangedco foreman had engaged the deceased without permission, and the foreman was subsequently suspended and punished
More
Recent Posts
- Hon’ble Supreme Court has refused the plea to extend the deadline for uploading Waqf property details on the UMEED Portal, reaffirming that 5 December 2025 remains the final date. As Minister of Minority Affairs, I have received several requests from Waqf Boards and stakeholders seeking an extension. For any grievance or issue related to Waqf properties, the UMEED Act provides a clear remedial mechanism, stakeholders may approach the Waqf Tribunal as prescribed under the law. The Ministry remains committed to transparency, accountability, and strengthening Waqf management across the country.
- *Madras High Court* – *Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers vs. Ilaiyaraaja – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja vs. Mythri Movie Makers and 2 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Mythri Movie Makers: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – Respondents: M/s. Jidesh Kumar, Navod Prasannan, Vijay R Sekar, Akalya Ravichandran, G. Lakshmi Prathista Reddy, RV. Che Guvera, Dhakshin Kumar – *Court Observation:* The case is listed for pronouncing orders.
- National Green Tribunal (NGT)* – *Bench:* Not specified – *Parties:* J. Brezhnev vs. Union Ministry of Environment and 7 Others – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: M/s. S. Tamil Selvan, R.S. Selva, P. Praveen, Samadhanam S. Prasath – Respondents: – R1: M/s. Dr. G. Babu (CG SR PC) – R2: A. Edwin Prabhakar (State Govt. Pleader) – R3: Smt. P. Veena Suresh (Standing Counsel) – R4-R7: K. Karthik Jagannath (Govt.) – *Court Observation:* The case is listed with appearances from various counsel for the respondents.
- *Madras High Court* – *Judges:* Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan – *Parties:* Rangarajan Narasimhan vs. The State – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Petitioner: Not specified – Respondent: Additional Government Advocate Rajtilak – *Court Observation:* The court directed the police to respond within 3 weeks to a petition seeking a special investigation team probe into an alleged attempt to steal a gold lizard idol from the Kancheepuram Varadaraja Perumal Temple.
- Madras High Court (Madurai Bench)* – *Judge:* Justice K. Kumaresh Babu – *Parties:* [Not specified in the news report] ( likely the family of the deceased vs. Tangedco) – *Date of Order:* December 2, 2025 – *Counsel:* Not specified – *Court Observation:* The court directed Tangedco to pay ₹20 lakh as compensation to the family of a man who was electrocuted while working on an electric pole installation without proper authorization. The court noted that a Tangedco foreman had engaged the deceased without permission, and the foreman was subsequently suspended and punished