You may also like...
-
-
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31934 of 2014 C.Jagadeesan …Petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances, the period of absence was regularized by the competent authority, the punishment of dismissal from service is untenable and consequently the order impugned passed by the second respondent in proceedings No.Tha.Pa.3/2012 dated 07.11.2012 and the appellate order passed by the first respondent in proceedings C.No.A2/PR No.3/Appeal/2012 dated 23.01.2013 are hereby quashed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the writ petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bala for M/s.G.Bala and Daisy For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader ORDER The order of dismissal from service which was confirmed by the .
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 8, 2022
-