You may also like...
-
Before parting with the judgment, this Court records the following. As stated by Mahatma Gandhi villages are heart of our country, the villages ought to be allowed to carry on their functions on their own, otherwise the villagers would be forced to leave the villages and it would lead to urbanization. This is applicable to the management of village temples as well. The powers and rights of the villages cannot be curtailed by appointing a fit person. Admittedly the fit person would be alien to the said village. In Panchayat Raj system the rights and powers would percolate to the villages. Likewise, the rights and powers of villages ought to be allowed to percolate to villages in the case of temple administration also. If any mistakes are committed, then it can be rectified by peace committee meeting, chance to rectify the mistakes. Not by straight away appointing a fit person. On the other hand, if any fit person is appointed, who is alien to the place would have other unwanted effects. In the present case now of renovation work is handed over to the said Hereditary Trustees along with the three villages and they would carry out their responsibility and conduct festival with euphoria. The next generation also would participate and would train to discharge the responsibility. On the other hand, if it is handed over to the fit person, the fit person would carry out, the hereditary trustee and the entire three villages would witness it without any contribution from their side, which would have the devil’s mind effect on them. The government should act as “mother” and entrust the responsibility to its “children”, rather than handing it over to the 3rd party. Index : Yes / No 27.07.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No Tmg To 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department (HR & CE), Nungambakkam, Chennai. 2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department (HR & CE), Tanjore. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department (HR & CE), Pudukkottai. S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg W.P.(MD)Nos.28048 of 2022 and 7678 of 2023 27.07.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 27, 2023
-
சேலம், கன்னங்குறிச்சியைச் சேர்ந்த ராதாகிருஷ்ணன் என்பவர் தாக்கல் செய்த மனுவை விசாரித்த சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தின், தற்காலிக தலைமை நீதிபதி முனீஸ்வர்நாத் பண்டாரி, நீதிபதி பி.டி.ஆதிகேசவலு ஆகியோர் அடங்கிய முதல் டிவிஷன் பெஞ்ச், 3 வாரங்களுக்குள் பதில் மனு தாக்கல் செய்ய அரசுக்கு உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 16, 2022
-