சாட்சி விசாரணைக்கு தடை கேட்டு செந்தில் பாலாஜி புதிய மனு கோர்ட்டுக்கு வந்த வீடியோ

by Sekar Reporter · October 7, 2025

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  .Applying the ratio laid down in the aforesaid decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court to the facts of the present case, this court is of the opinion that the second respondent bank being a secured creditor and created right over the property in question prior to the alleged attachment raised by the appellant and hence, they have preferential right over the claim of the appellant. In such view of the matter, the order of the learned Judge cannot be interfered with. 19.In fine, the writ appeal fails and is accordingly, dismissed. The appellant is directed to lift the attachment over the property in question, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. There is no order as to costs. (R.M.D., J.)       (J.S.N.P., J.). For Appellant :   Mr. V. Sundareswaran For Respondents :   Mr. R.N. Amarnath for R1 Mr.  F.B. Benjamin George for R2 JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN,J. The order of the learned Judge dated 12.02.2019 made in WP.No. 25185 of 2018 is questioned by the appellant / Revenue, in this writ appeal.

  July 7, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 7, 2022

• 

  Justice S Srimathy gave the direction on an anticipatory bail petition filed by six trustees — Thannermalai, Muthuraman, Alagu Narayanan, Arunachalam, Swaminathan, and Balamurugan. According to the prosecution, the six were booked by the district crime branch,

  December 29, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 29, 2025

• 

  MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.O.P.Nos.3526, 3529, 4642 and 4746 of 2025 Crl.O.P.No.3526 of 2025 S.P.Arumugam The State rep by The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Trichirapalli

  August 9, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published August 9, 2025