You may also like...
-
![[3/29, 11:26] Sekarreporter1: [3/29, 11:25] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1376412683981910018?s=08 [3/29, 11:25] Sekarreporter1: ஆவடி தொகுதியில் தேர்தலை தள்ளிவைக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் மறுத்து எம்.ஜி.ஆர்.விஸ்வநாதன் மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்துள்ளது. [3/29, 11:26] Sekarreporter1: [3/29, 11:23] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1376412024528195592?s=08 [3/29, 11:23] Sekarreporter1: Madras HC directs M. Thirupathy, an Independent candidate in Tiruchuli Assembly constituency, to approach the Election Commission with his plea to disqualify DMK candidate Thangam Thennarasu from contesting since the latter had allegedly distributed gifts to voters. @THChennai](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
[3/29, 11:26] Sekarreporter1: [3/29, 11:25] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1376412683981910018?s=08 [3/29, 11:25] Sekarreporter1: ஆவடி தொகுதியில் தேர்தலை தள்ளிவைக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் மறுத்து எம்.ஜி.ஆர்.விஸ்வநாதன் மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்துள்ளது. [3/29, 11:26] Sekarreporter1: [3/29, 11:23] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1376412024528195592?s=08 [3/29, 11:23] Sekarreporter1: Madras HC directs M. Thirupathy, an Independent candidate in Tiruchuli Assembly constituency, to approach the Election Commission with his plea to disqualify DMK candidate Thangam Thennarasu from contesting since the latter had allegedly distributed gifts to voters. @THChennai
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 29, 2021
-
Medical college and deemed university fees case mhc cheif justice bench full order. Petitioner in : Mr.Vijay Narayan W.P.No.10088 of 2022 Senior Counsel for Mr.Abishek Jenasenan For the Respondents in : Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan W.P.No.10088 of 2022 Addl. Solicitor-General assisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekananthan Asst. Solicitor-General for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Ms.Shubaranjani Anand for respondent No.3 and Ms.V.Sudha for respondent No.4 and batch cases: COMMON ORDER THE CHIEF JUSTICE
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 9, 2022
-
[08/01, 18:10] Advt Ramasivasanker: WP 49241 of 2025 was filed by Advocate Shoukath Ali Mohammed as the petitioner challenging the constitution of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board under the Government Order dated 28/11/2025. The Main grounds are that the nominees of the Bar Council were not appointed and that two non-muslims were not appointed amongst others. The Case was listed as item number 40 before the Honourable First Bench on 08/01/2025 i.e. Wednesday. Mr S. Ravi Senior Counsel appeared for M/s M. Purushothaman and J. Bindu Madhavan, counsel for petitioner. Mr PS Raman Advocate General appeared for the State of Tamil Nadu. Mr. P. Wilson, Senior Counsel appeared for the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board. Mr VT Balaji, Senior Panel Counsel for the Central Government appeared for the central government. After hearing the arguments at length, the Honorable First Bench stayed the Government Order re-constituting the TN Waqf Board as per New Amended Waqf Act for not constituting the TN Waqf Board in accordance with Section 14 of New Waqf Act and has injunted the TN Waqf Board from functioning further. It is needless to say that all the actions taken by the TN Waqf Board are void as the constitution of the board is ultra vires of New Amended Waqf Act [08/01, 18:10] Sekarreporter: ok’
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 8, 2026