Follow:
- Next story மருத்துவ மேற்படிப்பு மாணவர் சேர்க்கையை இறுதி செய்ய வேண்டாம் அனைத்து கல்லூரிகளுக்கும் அறிவுறுத்த தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவு
- Previous story மணல் கடத்தல் வழக்குகளில் சிக்குவோருக்கு இனி முன்ஜாமீன் கிடையாது என்று சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் அதிரடி உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்துள்ளது…
Recent Posts
- Senior counsel Arvind Datar, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the amendments made to the Income Tax Act, 1961, overrule judgments of the Supreme Court and various high courts, thereby violating the constitutional principle of separation of powers between the judiciary and the executive.
- HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI O.S.A.Nos.93, 95 and 96 of 2026 and C.M.P.Nos. 13800, 13802, 13834, 13836, 13837 and 13838 of 2026 and O.S.A.Nos.94, 97 and 98 of 2026 and C.M.P.Nos.13835, 13839, 13841, 13842, 13846 and 13850 of 2026 and O.S.A.Nos. 88, 89 and 90 of 2026 and C.M.P.Nos. 13075, 13078 and 13079 of 2026 O.S.A.Nos.93, 95 and 96 of 2026 C.Chockalingam … Appellant in all O.S.As Vs. 1. M.A.M.R Muthiah 2. Geetha Muthiah 3. V.Palaniappan 4. V.Chandramoleeswaran 5. S.Hariharan 6. V.Valliammai 7. TR.Meyyappan 8. Kumara Rajah Muthiah School of Traditional Arts and Crafts Represented by its erstwhile Secretary Mrs.Kumara Rani Meena Muthiah, Chettinad House, Rajah Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. 9. Kumara Rani Meena Muthiah 10.AR.Ramaswamy 11.Vijay Reddy
- “HOME NEWS INDIA TAMIL NADU Madras High Court sets aside order appointing interim administrator for Chettinad Vidyashram school Division Bench requests a single judge to rehear the issue and pass fresh orders after affording an opportunity to all the parties to file their counter affidavits Updated – June 15, 2026 09:46 pm IST – CHENNAI THE HINDU BUREAU    Madras High Court The Division Bench of the Madras High Court has set aside an order passed by a single judge on May 14, 2025 appointing an interim administrator for a society which runs Chettinad Vidyashram School in Chennai and remitted the matter to the single judge for fresh consideration.  The Bench comprising Justices P. Velmurugan and K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi requested the single judge to afford an opportunity to all the parties concerned to file their counter affidavits before passing orders on a plea to appoint a Special Officer, by the District Registrar of Societies, to administer the society.” https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/madras-high-court-sets-aside-order-appointing-interim-administrator-for-chettinad-vidyashram-school/article71104492.ece#:~:text=HOME,administer%20the%20society.
- A Division Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Justices P. Velmurugan and K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi, on Monday, dismissed Original Side Appeal Nos. 62 and 63 of 2026, which had been preferred against the order passed by Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy permitting the release of the film Dhruva Natchathiram. Mr. S.R. Rajagopal, Senior Counsel, and Mr. S.R. Sundar appeared on behalf of the appellants, while Mr. T.R. Rajagopal and Mr. Abdul Hameed, Senior Counsels, represented the respondents. While dismissing the appeals, the Division Bench granted liberty to the appellants to approach the learned Single Judge, before whom the Original Applications remain pending, should they seek any alteration, modification, clarification, or further relief in relation to the order already passed.
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD).No.2497 of 2026 and W.P.M.P.Crl.(MD)No.731 of 2026 K. Surya … Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,
More
Recent Posts
- Senior counsel Arvind Datar, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the amendments made to the Income Tax Act, 1961, overrule judgments of the Supreme Court and various high courts, thereby violating the constitutional principle of separation of powers between the judiciary and the executive.
- HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI O.S.A.Nos.93, 95 and 96 of 2026 and C.M.P.Nos. 13800, 13802, 13834, 13836, 13837 and 13838 of 2026 and O.S.A.Nos.94, 97 and 98 of 2026 and C.M.P.Nos.13835, 13839, 13841, 13842, 13846 and 13850 of 2026 and O.S.A.Nos. 88, 89 and 90 of 2026 and C.M.P.Nos. 13075, 13078 and 13079 of 2026 O.S.A.Nos.93, 95 and 96 of 2026 C.Chockalingam … Appellant in all O.S.As Vs. 1. M.A.M.R Muthiah 2. Geetha Muthiah 3. V.Palaniappan 4. V.Chandramoleeswaran 5. S.Hariharan 6. V.Valliammai 7. TR.Meyyappan 8. Kumara Rajah Muthiah School of Traditional Arts and Crafts Represented by its erstwhile Secretary Mrs.Kumara Rani Meena Muthiah, Chettinad House, Rajah Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. 9. Kumara Rani Meena Muthiah 10.AR.Ramaswamy 11.Vijay Reddy
- “HOME NEWS INDIA TAMIL NADU Madras High Court sets aside order appointing interim administrator for Chettinad Vidyashram school Division Bench requests a single judge to rehear the issue and pass fresh orders after affording an opportunity to all the parties to file their counter affidavits Updated – June 15, 2026 09:46 pm IST – CHENNAI THE HINDU BUREAU    Madras High Court The Division Bench of the Madras High Court has set aside an order passed by a single judge on May 14, 2025 appointing an interim administrator for a society which runs Chettinad Vidyashram School in Chennai and remitted the matter to the single judge for fresh consideration.  The Bench comprising Justices P. Velmurugan and K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi requested the single judge to afford an opportunity to all the parties concerned to file their counter affidavits before passing orders on a plea to appoint a Special Officer, by the District Registrar of Societies, to administer the society.” https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/madras-high-court-sets-aside-order-appointing-interim-administrator-for-chettinad-vidyashram-school/article71104492.ece#:~:text=HOME,administer%20the%20society.
- A Division Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Justices P. Velmurugan and K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi, on Monday, dismissed Original Side Appeal Nos. 62 and 63 of 2026, which had been preferred against the order passed by Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy permitting the release of the film Dhruva Natchathiram. Mr. S.R. Rajagopal, Senior Counsel, and Mr. S.R. Sundar appeared on behalf of the appellants, while Mr. T.R. Rajagopal and Mr. Abdul Hameed, Senior Counsels, represented the respondents. While dismissing the appeals, the Division Bench granted liberty to the appellants to approach the learned Single Judge, before whom the Original Applications remain pending, should they seek any alteration, modification, clarification, or further relief in relation to the order already passed.
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD).No.2497 of 2026 and W.P.M.P.Crl.(MD)No.731 of 2026 K. Surya … Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,