Follow:
- Next story Sc vrsj வக்கீல் தொழிலில் தொழில் தர்மம் என்ற வார்த்தையைப் புரிந்து கொள்வது சிக்கலானது. இந்த தொழிலைப் பொருத்தவரை உங்களிடம் வரும் வழக்காடிகளின் பக்கம் இருக்கும் நியாயத்தை மட்டும் எடுத்துக் கூறுவதே தொழில் தருமம. வழக்கில் வெற்றிப் பெறுவது மட்டுமே தொழில் தர்மம் இல்லை என்பதை முதலில் புரிந்து கொள்ள வேண்டும். வழக்கடிகள் தரப்பில் கருப்பு மற்றும் வெள்ளை பக்கங்களை இருக்கும். அதை உணர்த்தவே வக்கீல்கள் கருப்பு வெள்ளை ஆடைகளை அணிகின்றனர். எனவே உண்மையைச் சொன்னால் வெற்றி கிடைக்காது என்ற நம்பிக்கையை உடைத்தெறிய வேண்டும்.
- Previous story [2/2, 08:06] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1223797093426290688?s=08 [2/2, 08:06] Sekarreporter 1: Chief Justice Sahi, in his special address, said personal behaviour, maintaining a high ethical standard, and exhibiting a strong character were some of the primal facets which had to be observed by every lawyer. “I say this, that in contemporary times, even though it still remains the noble profession, law is looked up with respect, but unfortunately, at times, in public opinion, lawyers are suspects,” he pointed out. Urging lawyers to improve upon such opinions by their professional conduct, he said their intellect should be guided more by common sense, logic and applicability of law to life, rather than prowess of superior intelligence, that might lead only to theoretical heights without pragmatic results. “Your job is the most difficult in the world, and that is the art of persuading the human mind to believe that whatever you are saying is the best.” “Today’s society, as civilized as it is today, is still strewn with strife, where tensions mount high due to rival thoughts — be it the issue of thickness of a pin or the width of the galaxies. A lawyer, therefore, has to train himself and his mind to keep within the confines of the cause, but at the same time, not let his imagination be curtailed, as a petty problem today might become a universal problem tomorrow.” “Illustrations are not far to see whether the throwing of a paper on the roadside is only a petty nuisance or the dumping of nuclear garbage in the seas is a far greater threat to humanity. Lawyers and members of the legal profession, in whatever field they are, their devotion of thought process has to travel the entire horizon, conquer mirages, and at times, even travel into the unknown,” he said. The university’s vice-chancellor, T.S.N. Sastry, also spoke.
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025
More
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025