You may also like...
Madurai. A division bench of Justices N Kirubakaran and B Pugalendhi observed that the court’s valuable time is spent on cases pertaining to encroachments at both high court’s Madurai bench and the principal seat. Since the menace is increasing, the courts are unable to spend time on other cases which require its attention. Though there has been no improvement with regard to removal of encroachments in the state, the officials could not be blamed as the encroachers are often powerful and there is no security to the lives of officials. The judges said that though it was stated that most of the encroachers are people below the poverty line, the court cannot show any misplaced sympathy to the encroachers as it would create a bad precedent.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 27, 2020
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.No.7825 of 2020 full order. In the above circumstances, this Court is of the view that the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the Corporation is to be directed to re-visit the entire issue afresh. Hence, the impugned order dated 24.03.2020 made in SZ/MKTG passed by the respondent, is hereby set aside. The respondent Corporation is directed to conduct an enquiry into the claim of the petitioner by calling for necessary evidence that are available and in the process, examine the petitioner himself and any other officials involved in the subject selection. On conclusion of the enquiry, if it is unimpeachably proved that the petitioner was a person who attended the main examination, the Corporation is directed to complete the process of interview and in the process, if the petitioner successful, appoint him to the post of Apprentice Development Officer. It is also made clear that in any case, the result of the enquiry shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 11, 2021