Follow:
- Next story நாளை வெளியாகும் நாடோடி படத்துக்கு mhc judge pt asha j granted stay for petner senior advt p l Narayanan argued got stay
- Previous story One Zahir Hussain who made allegation against the schemes of coimbatore corporation like solar plant, etc. he had also spoken very badly about Hon’ble Minister S P Velumani in voice message and circulated the same in facebook and whatsapp. This person has filed Bail application in Crl.O.P.1848/2020 and the same was listed as item 16 before Lordship Seshasayee in Court Hall.36 today. State PP A.Natarajan appeared for the police and vehemently apposed the Bail application as though how he can circulate these kind of things without verifying. Justice Seshasayee asked the petitioners what qualification this petitioner has ? How can he say solar plant will affect the human body. Whether he is highly and scentifically qualified to critize these schemes. Justice also stated that he will view this very seriously and this is not amounting to free speech and he must have more responsibility as a citizen
Recent Posts
- Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers (Applicant/Defendant) – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja (Respondent/Plaintiff) – *Case No:* C.S.(Comm.Div) No. 226 of 2025 – *Application No:* (link unavailable) 4570 of 2025 – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Applicant/Defendant: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Respondent/Plaintiff: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – *Court Observation:* The court dismissed the applicant’s application, holding that the respondent/plaintiff is entitled to protect his musical works from distortion or unauthorized exploitation. The validity of the transfer of rights in favor of the applicant is a triable issue to be examined during trial.
- Illayaraja case order HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR A No. 4570 of 2025 in C.S. (Comm. Div.) No.226 of 2025 Mythri Movie Makers
- Pallikaranai
- TN Government Returns Madras High Court Collegium Recommendations — First in Indian Judiciary In an unprecedented move in Indian judicial history, the Government of Tamil Nadu has returned the Madras High Court Collegium’s recommendations for the elevation of six District Judges to the High Court.
- : *Chennai, 03 December 2025* The writ petition W.P. No. 47451 of 2025, filed by Haji T. S. Ahmed Ibrahim, was listed today for admission before the Hon’ble Justice P. B. Balaji in Court Hall C-42. In this petition, the petitioner challenges G.O.(Ms) No. 97 dated 28.11.2025, issued by the Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare (T1) Department, relating to the nomination and appointment of Waqf Board members. The petitioner contends that two non-Muslim members were not appointed, as mandated under the second proviso to Section 14 of the UUWMEED Act, 1995. He therefore seeks a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the said Government Order on the grounds that it is illegal, arbitrary, and without authority of law. He further prays for a direction to the State Government to constitute the Waqf Board strictly in accordance with Section 14 of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995 (as amended by Act 14 of 2025) and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s order dated 15.09.2025 in *Re: The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025* (W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025). Appearances: * Mr. V. Meenakshi Sundaram, for Mr. Vashik Ali, appearing for the petitioner. * Mr. P. S. Raman, Learned Advocate General and Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Fazil, Government Advocate, for the State Government. * Mr. V. Raghavachari, Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. Avinash, for the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board. The Hon’ble Court has adjourned the matter to 09 December 2025 for filing of counter affidavits and for further hearing. [03/12, 11:24] Sekarreporter: 👍
More
Recent Posts
- Judge:* Justice N Senthil Kumar – *Parties:* – Mythri Movie Makers (Applicant/Defendant) – Dr. Ilaiyaraaja (Respondent/Plaintiff) – *Case No:* C.S.(Comm.Div) No. 226 of 2025 – *Application No:* (link unavailable) 4570 of 2025 – *Date of Order:* Not specified – *Counsel:* – Applicant/Defendant: M/s. Rahul Balakrishnan – Respondent/Plaintiff: M/s. Thyagarajan K, A. Saravanan, S. Magaimairaaj – *Court Observation:* The court dismissed the applicant’s application, holding that the respondent/plaintiff is entitled to protect his musical works from distortion or unauthorized exploitation. The validity of the transfer of rights in favor of the applicant is a triable issue to be examined during trial.
- Illayaraja case order HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR A No. 4570 of 2025 in C.S. (Comm. Div.) No.226 of 2025 Mythri Movie Makers
- Pallikaranai
- TN Government Returns Madras High Court Collegium Recommendations — First in Indian Judiciary In an unprecedented move in Indian judicial history, the Government of Tamil Nadu has returned the Madras High Court Collegium’s recommendations for the elevation of six District Judges to the High Court.
- : *Chennai, 03 December 2025* The writ petition W.P. No. 47451 of 2025, filed by Haji T. S. Ahmed Ibrahim, was listed today for admission before the Hon’ble Justice P. B. Balaji in Court Hall C-42. In this petition, the petitioner challenges G.O.(Ms) No. 97 dated 28.11.2025, issued by the Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare (T1) Department, relating to the nomination and appointment of Waqf Board members. The petitioner contends that two non-Muslim members were not appointed, as mandated under the second proviso to Section 14 of the UUWMEED Act, 1995. He therefore seeks a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the said Government Order on the grounds that it is illegal, arbitrary, and without authority of law. He further prays for a direction to the State Government to constitute the Waqf Board strictly in accordance with Section 14 of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 1995 (as amended by Act 14 of 2025) and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s order dated 15.09.2025 in *Re: The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025* (W.P.(C) No. 276 of 2025). Appearances: * Mr. V. Meenakshi Sundaram, for Mr. Vashik Ali, appearing for the petitioner. * Mr. P. S. Raman, Learned Advocate General and Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Fazil, Government Advocate, for the State Government. * Mr. V. Raghavachari, Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. Avinash, for the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board. The Hon’ble Court has adjourned the matter to 09 December 2025 for filing of counter affidavits and for further hearing. [03/12, 11:24] Sekarreporter: 👍