You may also like...
-
Patta case full order of justice D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J. These matters have been listed today under the caption “for reporting compliance”. In view of the fact that the respondents have not complied with the orders of this Court and keeping the applications pending for more than 30 days contrary to the Government Orders and the orders passed by this Court, both the Director of Survey and Settlement and the Commissioner of Land Administration are directed to take all efforts to dispose of the pending applications within a period of two weeks in compliance with the order passed by this Court. The District Collectors shall also strictly comply with the Circulars issued by the Commissioner of
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 30, 2021
-
-
W.P.Nos.1606, 1608, 1609, 1610 & 1614 of 2024and W.M.P.Nos.1635, 1639, 1640, 1643, 1644, 1645, 1646, 1648, 1641 & 1649 of 2024SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,JWhile learned senior counsel for the petitioner relied on several judgments, including the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Radhakrishnan Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2021)6 SCC 771, to contend that the impugned attachment orders are liable to be quashed, learned senior standing counsel for the respondents distinguished those judgments, cited other judgments such as Sahara Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax-I Lucknow, (2014)270 CTR 91 (Allahabad) and contended that the impugned order fully complies with the requirements of Section 281B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 16, 2024