Follow:
- Next story Rajiv Gandhi assassination: SC wants to know T.N.’s position on convict’s mercy plea:
- Previous story Hon’ble Full Bench, consisting of Their Lordships, Hon’ble The Chief Justice, Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.D. Audikesavalu. On behalf of the respondents, District Collector and the Government, the State Government Pleader Thiru V. Jayaprakashnarayanan appeared. The State Government Pleader submitted that as per Rule 8 of Tamil Nadu Liquor Vending Rules, no liquor shop will be permitted within the distance of 100 meters from the Religious Places and Educational Institutions. The said Rule is strictly followed by the authorities while locating the TASMAC shop for retail vending. Apart from that the TASMAC also issued circular in the year, wherein a direction was issued to the authorities, if there is any objections received, either from the Villagers or Grama Saba the same should be taken into consideration and the District Collectors were directed to drop such proposal. Further, the officers should avoid selecting places for location of shops in thickly populated areas. 41 such proposals were dropped; further the Government also already closed more than 3000 liquor shops. Therefore, the liquor vending rules and circulars will be taken care of the objections raised by the Village Panchayat and public at large before locating the liquor shops by TASMAC.
Recent Posts
- Removal of. encroachments S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 4677/1985 M.C.MEHTA Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (MATTER IS LISTED ONLY FOR DIRECTIONS ONLY NAMES OF FOLLOWING ADVOCATES MAY BE TREATED TO HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE LIST :MR. S GURU KRISHNA KUMAR, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.) MS. ANITHA SHENOY, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)MR. A.D.N. RAO, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)PETITIONER-IN-PERSON MR. G.S. MAKKER,MR. AMRISH KUMAR,MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP, MR. NISHIT AGRAWAL,MR. CHIRAG M. SHROFF, ADVOCATES ) Date : 30-09-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA Mr. S. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Ms. Aarti
- The Court while invoking the principles of Karma granted relief to the Petitioner-cop. “In the principles of Karma the “Sanchita Karma” (entire karma) is apportioned as “Prarabdha Karma” (portion of the karma) and punishment is imposed to undergo only for the “Prarabdha Karma” (portion of the karma).”, the bench of Justice S. Srimathy observed. – full order THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD).No.19529 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14256 and 14257 of 2022 R.Srimurugan … Petitioner
- Quoting a Supreme Court order, Justice K Murali Shankar ruled last month that the position of law is well settled and that there is no bar or prohibition of initiating simultaneous proceedings claiming maintenance under different Acts, but while deciding the quantum of maintenance, the subsequent proceedings shall take into account the award made in the previous proceedings.
- Observing thus, the Bench of Justice Sandipkumar More quashed the lower court’s order granting the right to residence to a woman including access to amenities in the house.
- A bench of justices Surya Kant and V Ramasubramanian set aside an order of the Madurai Bench of Madras HC order which reduced the compensation granted to appellants from Rs 4,29,37,700 to Rs 57,90,000.
More
Recent Posts
- Removal of. encroachments S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 4677/1985 M.C.MEHTA Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (MATTER IS LISTED ONLY FOR DIRECTIONS ONLY NAMES OF FOLLOWING ADVOCATES MAY BE TREATED TO HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE LIST :MR. S GURU KRISHNA KUMAR, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.) MS. ANITHA SHENOY, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)MR. A.D.N. RAO, SR. ADVOCATE (A.C.)PETITIONER-IN-PERSON MR. G.S. MAKKER,MR. AMRISH KUMAR,MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP, MR. NISHIT AGRAWAL,MR. CHIRAG M. SHROFF, ADVOCATES ) Date : 30-09-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA Mr. S. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Ms. Aarti
- The Court while invoking the principles of Karma granted relief to the Petitioner-cop. “In the principles of Karma the “Sanchita Karma” (entire karma) is apportioned as “Prarabdha Karma” (portion of the karma) and punishment is imposed to undergo only for the “Prarabdha Karma” (portion of the karma).”, the bench of Justice S. Srimathy observed. – full order THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY (MD).No.19529 of 2022and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.14256 and 14257 of 2022 R.Srimurugan … Petitioner
- Quoting a Supreme Court order, Justice K Murali Shankar ruled last month that the position of law is well settled and that there is no bar or prohibition of initiating simultaneous proceedings claiming maintenance under different Acts, but while deciding the quantum of maintenance, the subsequent proceedings shall take into account the award made in the previous proceedings.
- Observing thus, the Bench of Justice Sandipkumar More quashed the lower court’s order granting the right to residence to a woman including access to amenities in the house.
- A bench of justices Surya Kant and V Ramasubramanian set aside an order of the Madurai Bench of Madras HC order which reduced the compensation granted to appellants from Rs 4,29,37,700 to Rs 57,90,000.
