Follow:
- Next story Rajiv Gandhi assassination: SC wants to know T.N.’s position on convict’s mercy plea:
- Previous story Hon’ble Full Bench, consisting of Their Lordships, Hon’ble The Chief Justice, Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.V. Karthikeyan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.D. Audikesavalu. On behalf of the respondents, District Collector and the Government, the State Government Pleader Thiru V. Jayaprakashnarayanan appeared. The State Government Pleader submitted that as per Rule 8 of Tamil Nadu Liquor Vending Rules, no liquor shop will be permitted within the distance of 100 meters from the Religious Places and Educational Institutions. The said Rule is strictly followed by the authorities while locating the TASMAC shop for retail vending. Apart from that the TASMAC also issued circular in the year, wherein a direction was issued to the authorities, if there is any objections received, either from the Villagers or Grama Saba the same should be taken into consideration and the District Collectors were directed to drop such proposal. Further, the officers should avoid selecting places for location of shops in thickly populated areas. 41 such proposals were dropped; further the Government also already closed more than 3000 liquor shops. Therefore, the liquor vending rules and circulars will be taken care of the objections raised by the Village Panchayat and public at large before locating the liquor shops by TASMAC.
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025
More
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025
