Skip to content

Primary Menu

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Search for:

Home
Uncategorized
Justice R Subramaniyam sir good speech

Uncategorized

Justice R Subramaniyam sir good speech

By Sekar Reporter 2 years ago

Continue Reading

Previous Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: Citation for Section 152, order 6 rule 17; order 2 rule 2 posted yesterday 2009(4) SCJ 417 [12/18, 17:45] Cpc G. Surya Narayanan Mhc Advt: ORDER LXI RULE 4 – 2009(4) SCJ 623 A.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VS. BALOJI BADHAVATH

Next Hero படம். நாளை திரையிட ஐகோர்ட் lordship pt asha mam அனுமதி வழங்கினார் with some condition https://t.co/6oFmZ2JRZE [12/19, 20:53] Sekarreporter 1: For financier PR raman senior advt for film mhc advt Vijayan Subramaniyan [12/19, 20:54] Sekarreporter 1: இரவு 9 மணிக்கு தீர்ப்பு

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Search for:

Recent Posts

R. Singgaravelan — RELIGIOUS FAITH AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION I – PRELUDE AND THE CAUSE: Before dealing with the ongoing controversies in respect of an unique and very old Hindu Religion and the right of doing pujas in the temples, which stand to the test of time for thousands of years satisfying the faith and belief of the followers of Hinduism, I want to recall the observations of the Hon’ble Justice Sudhir Agarwal reproduced in Ram Janma Bhumi Temple Case at para 1311 reminding all of us the danger of making any casual comments in respect of the religious belief, faith and conscience of the majority of the people of our Country without even minding that those comments may divide the people in the name of religion, caste, creed and custom, which is the immediate cause to pen down
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.06.2021 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).No.10177 of 2021 S.R.M.Packiri Rajan 13. It is made clear that this procedure must be scrupulously followed in all cases, where the transaction has been declared to be a fraudulent one by the competent Authority and such order has become final. The Inspector General of Registration shall refer to this order and issue a circular to all the Sub Registrar Offices across Tamil Nadu and direct them to strictly follow the directions issued in the earlier circular dated 31.07.2018. 14. In view of the above, this Court is inclined to interfere with the impugned communication of the third respondent and accordingly, the same is quashed. There shall be a direction to the third respondent to take steps to record the proceedings of the second respondent, dated 30.04.2019 in the relevant books and the same should be reflected in the Encumbrance Certificate. This will effectively reverse the earlier entry that was made when the sale deed was executed in favour of the fifth respondent and which has been subsequently held to be a fraudulent transaction. This process shall be completed by the third respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Charge memo quashed The Honourable Mr. Justice R. Subbiah and The Honourable Mr. Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup Writ Appeal No. 2346 of 2019 ~~ P. Shankar .. Appellant advocate MRavi Priya ravi interview
. M. Ravindran Senior Advt: நிறைய பேருக்குத் தெரியப்படுத்துங்கள்.இரண்டு வருடங்களுக்கு முன்னர் வரை நானுமே அறிந்திராத விசயம். இன்று இப்பொழுது நண்பரொருவரிடம் பேசும் பொழுது அவருக்குமே தெரியவில்லே என்றும் தெரிய வந்தது.
6/22, 09:31] Sekarreporter: [6/22, 09:31] Sekarreporter: Suo Motu W.P. No. 12935 of 2021 Suo Motu W.P. No. 12935 of 2021 P.N. PRAKASH, J. and ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. At the outset, it may be necessary to briefly record the circumstances under which this special Bench has been constituted by the Hon’ble Chief Justice. 2 It came to the notice of the High Court that a staff member in the III Additional District Court, Patukkottai, has misappropriated a sum of about Rs.1.50 crores of MCOP compensation amounts, which resulted in the Portfolio Judges appointing the following three Committees: ➢ High Court Inspection Committee; ➢ 3-Member Sub Judge Committee; and ➢ Additional District Judge-cum-Principal Sub Judge Committee. 3 Notw

Recent Posts

R. Singgaravelan — RELIGIOUS FAITH AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION I – PRELUDE AND THE CAUSE: Before dealing with the ongoing controversies in respect of an unique and very old Hindu Religion and the right of doing pujas in the temples, which stand to the test of time for thousands of years satisfying the faith and belief of the followers of Hinduism, I want to recall the observations of the Hon’ble Justice Sudhir Agarwal reproduced in Ram Janma Bhumi Temple Case at para 1311 reminding all of us the danger of making any casual comments in respect of the religious belief, faith and conscience of the majority of the people of our Country without even minding that those comments may divide the people in the name of religion, caste, creed and custom, which is the immediate cause to pen down
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.06.2021 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).No.10177 of 2021 S.R.M.Packiri Rajan 13. It is made clear that this procedure must be scrupulously followed in all cases, where the transaction has been declared to be a fraudulent one by the competent Authority and such order has become final. The Inspector General of Registration shall refer to this order and issue a circular to all the Sub Registrar Offices across Tamil Nadu and direct them to strictly follow the directions issued in the earlier circular dated 31.07.2018. 14. In view of the above, this Court is inclined to interfere with the impugned communication of the third respondent and accordingly, the same is quashed. There shall be a direction to the third respondent to take steps to record the proceedings of the second respondent, dated 30.04.2019 in the relevant books and the same should be reflected in the Encumbrance Certificate. This will effectively reverse the earlier entry that was made when the sale deed was executed in favour of the fifth respondent and which has been subsequently held to be a fraudulent transaction. This process shall be completed by the third respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Charge memo quashed The Honourable Mr. Justice R. Subbiah and The Honourable Mr. Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup Writ Appeal No. 2346 of 2019 ~~ P. Shankar .. Appellant advocate MRavi Priya ravi interview
. M. Ravindran Senior Advt: நிறைய பேருக்குத் தெரியப்படுத்துங்கள்.இரண்டு வருடங்களுக்கு முன்னர் வரை நானுமே அறிந்திராத விசயம். இன்று இப்பொழுது நண்பரொருவரிடம் பேசும் பொழுது அவருக்குமே தெரியவில்லே என்றும் தெரிய வந்தது.
6/22, 09:31] Sekarreporter: [6/22, 09:31] Sekarreporter: Suo Motu W.P. No. 12935 of 2021 Suo Motu W.P. No. 12935 of 2021 P.N. PRAKASH, J. and ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. At the outset, it may be necessary to briefly record the circumstances under which this special Bench has been constituted by the Hon’ble Chief Justice. 2 It came to the notice of the High Court that a staff member in the III Additional District Court, Patukkottai, has misappropriated a sum of about Rs.1.50 crores of MCOP compensation amounts, which resulted in the Portfolio Judges appointing the following three Committees: ➢ High Court Inspection Committee; ➢ 3-Member Sub Judge Committee; and ➢ Additional District Judge-cum-Principal Sub Judge Committee. 3 Notw

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Magazine 7 by AF themes.

CALL ME