Skip to content

Primary Menu

Home
Gallery
Contact Us

Search for:

Home
Uncategorized
Govt response sought on plea to erect MK statue

Uncategorized

Govt response sought on plea to erect MK statue

By Sekar Reporter 11 months ago

Govt response sought on plea to erect MK statue

Continue Reading

Previous Govt response sought on plea to erect MK statue

Next Dr.ANITA SUMANTH, J. Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice for the respondents and seeks some time to obtain instructions and file counter. The basis for the impugned proceedings for re-assessment is to bring to tax capital gains that has, admittedly, being assessed in assessment year 2016-17 under an order of assessment dated 29.12.2018.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Search for:

Recent Posts

CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* *online webinar* for JUDICIAL EXAMS Date :31/10/2020 Timing: 11am to 1pm Subject: overview of all subjects
JUSTICE V. PARTHIBAN W.P.No.12495 of 2020 & W.M.P.Nos.15407, 15408 & 15409 ofIn the conspectus of the above discussion, this court is compelled to come to a conclusion that there has been wholesale violation of the rules and the procedure, as the 1st respondent
Justices N. Kirubakaran and B. Pugalendhi appointed advocate P. Ganapathi Subramanian as the advocate commissioner in the case. The court directed him to inspect the region and file a report after it was alleged that in the name of taking excess sand from a patta land nearby, sand was being excavated from Kottakarai river to a depth of five to ten feet.
Justices M Sathyanarayanan and R Hemalatha passed the directions on a plea moved by M Logarangan seeking action against delivery boys who were charging more than the billed amount.
The Madras High Court has slammed BSNL for refusing a compassionate-ground appointment for a deserving candidate, saying that it was its responsibility and not temple “prasad” or an act of charity.

Recent Posts

CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* *online webinar* for JUDICIAL EXAMS Date :31/10/2020 Timing: 11am to 1pm Subject: overview of all subjects
JUSTICE V. PARTHIBAN W.P.No.12495 of 2020 & W.M.P.Nos.15407, 15408 & 15409 ofIn the conspectus of the above discussion, this court is compelled to come to a conclusion that there has been wholesale violation of the rules and the procedure, as the 1st respondent
Justices N. Kirubakaran and B. Pugalendhi appointed advocate P. Ganapathi Subramanian as the advocate commissioner in the case. The court directed him to inspect the region and file a report after it was alleged that in the name of taking excess sand from a patta land nearby, sand was being excavated from Kottakarai river to a depth of five to ten feet.
Justices M Sathyanarayanan and R Hemalatha passed the directions on a plea moved by M Logarangan seeking action against delivery boys who were charging more than the billed amount.
The Madras High Court has slammed BSNL for refusing a compassionate-ground appointment for a deserving candidate, saying that it was its responsibility and not temple “prasad” or an act of charity.

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Magazine 7 by AF themes.

CALL ME