Follow:
- Next story Re: CMA No. 4375/2019 against MCOP No. 308/2015- Special Sub Court, CBE- Justices M M Sundresh and Krishnan Ramasamy – set aside an award for Rs.1,93,60,000/- with interest and costs, by orders dt.18/2/2020. And Registrar General High Court has been directed to initiate departmental action against the said Judge who passed the award and had also passed several similar awards. Very interesting Judgment which needs to be reported widely in public interest. Please check for orders in Item 26- 6th Court today.
- Previous story FERA case: Crl A No.180/2009 The appeal filed by the department (UOI) vs R Hon’ble Justice M.Dhandapani ed Appeal was allowed setting aside the lower court aqutial order & thereby confirming the conviction of all 6 accused. Ed advt Hema
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.9848 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.7042 & 7043 of 2026 Abdul Khader Mohammed Farook (M/56), S/o.Abdul Khader, No.59, M.K.N.Road, Guindy, Chennai-600032. PAN: AAHPF4076K. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1[1], Numgambakkam, … Petitioner Chennai-600034. … Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to E.O.C.C.No.133 of 2019 pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Egmore, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.N.Lavanya For Respondent : Ms.M.Sheela, Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) and Mr.H.Siddarth, Junior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) ORDER The petitioner/accused facing trial for offence under Section 276C(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 before the learned Additional Chief
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2193 /2026 [@ SLP [CRL.] NO.18828/2025] MOHAN KARTHIK & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents.
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/parameters-for-sections-1563-200-crpc-are-different-supreme-court-sets-aside-hc-order-allowing-second-1563-plea-532935 [05/05, 15:23] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has held that the parameters governing the invocation of Sections 156(3) and 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 operate in distinct fields, setting aside a High Court order that had
- https://x.com/i/status/2051594369271271840 [05/05, 15:20] sekarreporter1: ‘Parameters For Sections 156(3) & 200 CrPC Are Different’: Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Allowing Second 156(3) Plea |@mittal_mtn
- Sabarimala Reference Hearing – Day 11 | 05.05.2026* *9-Judge Constitution Bench | CJI Surya Kant presiding* *Bench*: Justices B.V. Nagarathna, M.M. Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, A.G. Masih, R. Mahadevan, Prasanna B. Varale, Joymalya Bagchi 28ac
More
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.9848 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.7042 & 7043 of 2026 Abdul Khader Mohammed Farook (M/56), S/o.Abdul Khader, No.59, M.K.N.Road, Guindy, Chennai-600032. PAN: AAHPF4076K. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1[1], Numgambakkam, … Petitioner Chennai-600034. … Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to E.O.C.C.No.133 of 2019 pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Egmore, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.N.Lavanya For Respondent : Ms.M.Sheela, Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) and Mr.H.Siddarth, Junior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) ORDER The petitioner/accused facing trial for offence under Section 276C(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 before the learned Additional Chief
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2193 /2026 [@ SLP [CRL.] NO.18828/2025] MOHAN KARTHIK & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents.
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/parameters-for-sections-1563-200-crpc-are-different-supreme-court-sets-aside-hc-order-allowing-second-1563-plea-532935 [05/05, 15:23] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has held that the parameters governing the invocation of Sections 156(3) and 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 operate in distinct fields, setting aside a High Court order that had
- https://x.com/i/status/2051594369271271840 [05/05, 15:20] sekarreporter1: ‘Parameters For Sections 156(3) & 200 CrPC Are Different’: Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Allowing Second 156(3) Plea |@mittal_mtn
- Sabarimala Reference Hearing – Day 11 | 05.05.2026* *9-Judge Constitution Bench | CJI Surya Kant presiding* *Bench*: Justices B.V. Nagarathna, M.M. Sundresh, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, A.G. Masih, R. Mahadevan, Prasanna B. Varale, Joymalya Bagchi 28ac