[12/29, 16:54] Sekarreporter 1: https://dinamalarandroidapp.page.link/bdeREBWYpEqE75jp7 Dinamalar [12/29, 16:54] Sekarreporter 1: 👍👍

You may also like...

• 

  Judge barathidasan ordered notice to ec in two electuon case —-கிருஷ்ணகிரி மற்றும் வேதாரண்யம் தொகுதி அதிமுக எம்.எல்.ஏ.க்கள் வெற்றியை எதிர்த்து, திமுக வேட்பாளர்கள் தாக்கல் செய்த தேர்தல் வழக்குகளுக்கு பதிலளிக்க அதிமுக எம்.எல்.ஏ.க்களுக்கும், தேர்தல் ஆணையத்துக்கும் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

  July 30, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 30, 2021

• 

  Justices M Sathyanarayanan and P Rajamanickam observed that the primordial submission made by the petitioner is that since the temple is located from time immemorial, some right has been created. It is open to the concerned people, in charge of the temple, to seek appropriate remedy as the said issues cannot be adjudicated by this court.

  October 5, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published October 5, 2020

• 

  Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ; Order 23 Rule 3 and Order 43 Rule 1A – An aggrieved person against the compromise decree has a right to file an application before the Court which granted the decree – He has the right to avail either the remedy of appeal in terms of Order 43 Rule 1A CPC or by way of an application before the court granting decree [Referred to Banwari Lal V. Chando Devi (Smt.) (Through LRS.) & Anr.’ (1993) 1 SCC 581] HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

  May 3, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published May 3, 2022