Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 601 : Ravi Raman vs Arul viswanathan : order 16 rule 1 ( 111) CPC 1908 : witness whose name is not reflected in list of witnesses can still be summoned on showing sufficient cause for omission

[06/11, 14:59] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 601 : Ravi Raman vs Arul viswanathan : order 16 rule 1 ( 111) CPC 1908 : witness whose name is not reflected in list of witnesses can still be summoned on showing sufficient cause for omission
[06/11, 14:59] Vinothpandian: 2013 (4) crimes 22 SC : kantilal martaji pandor vs state of gujarat : Allowing the first wife to reside with second wife with newly born child is not cruelty ( section 498 A IPC 1860)
[06/11, 14:59] Vinothpandian: 2013(4) CTC 468 : G Subramani vs V Rajasekar an : CPC 1908 order 7rule 11 : plaint not to be rejected on basis of defence made in written statement ,bar of res judicata an issue to be raised and decided and not a ground to reject plaint
[06/11, 14:59] Vinothpandian: 2008(11) SCC 769 : zolba vs keshao : erroneous advice by an advocate is a sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing written statements
[06/11, 14:59] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) Acquittal 66 : Garbhu yadav and another vs state of bihar : court cannot and should not pick up 0ne single line of evidence and consider it to raise an inference in criminal trial proceedings