Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 43 ( DB ) : uniplas india ltd vs state : mere breach of contract would not give rise to an offence of cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention was alleged right at the beginining of transaction

[29/08, 10:17] Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 43 ( DB ) : uniplas india ltd vs state : mere breach of contract would not give rise to an offence of cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention was alleged right at the beginining of transaction
[29/08, 10:17] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) CCC 510 : Notified area council vs Titilagarh club : order 8 rule 9 CPC prohibits any pleadings subsequent to written statement of a defendant being filed other than by way of defence to a set off or counterclaim except by leave of court and upon such terms as court thinks fit
[29/08, 10:17] Vinothpandian: 2017 (1) CTC 198 : Thirumalai S vs S Govindarajan : unregistered partition deed cannot be admitted in evidence even for collateral purpose
[01/09, 10:16] Vinothpandian: 2011 (4) SCC 363 : lanka venkateswarlu vs state of Andhra pradesh : If any application under section 5 of the limitation act is filed for condonation of delay on basis of enough reasons , concerned court often has liberal approach in respect there of
[01/09, 10:16] Vinothpandian: 2014 (4) SCC 186 : SVA steel.Re- rolling mills ltd & others vs state of kerala : Held provisions of section 22 – B electricity act 1910 are not applicable where state had given an assurance with regard to uninterrupted supply of electricity to consumers
[01/09, 10:16] Vinothpandian: AIR 2011 SC 2057 : vimleshwar nagappa shet vs noor ahmad sheriff & others ; A concession made by a counsel on a question of fact held is binding on the client , but if it is on a questional of law it is not binding ( order 3 rule 1 & 2 CPC 1908 )
[01/09, 10:16] Vinothpandian: 2018(4)CTC 199: S Rathinavelu Chettiar trust vs R Padmanabha n ( died ) : section 12 contempt of courts act 1971 : contemnor agreed to vacate premises as per undertaking , wilful disobedience and breach of undertaking given to court , conduct of contemnors amount to playing fraud on court , contemnors are sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay finea