You may also like...
-
The Madras high court on Wednesday refused to stay reopening of Tasmac
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 6, 2020
-
-
https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1722491843924090938?t=091Nwg2ZU_-DAYbN7Wtvsw&s=08 So far as the Government Respondents 1 to 2 are concerned, they did not have any objection to the certificates produced by the third Respondent. According to them, the documents filed by the third Respondent are genuine and they are not the products of forgery or misrepresentation. The Petitioner has his own adverse idea about the entitlement of residential status of the petitioner at her parents’ house. With that adversity in mind, this petition has been filed and which in my opinion does not have any merits. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. 30.10.2023 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order sai R.N.MANJULA, J. sai To 1.The District Collector Cuddalore District Cuddalore 2.The Special Officer/Block Development Officer Jayakondan Village Panchayat Bhuvanagiri Taluk Melbhuvanagiri Cuddalore District W.P. No.2456 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.2772 & 2773 of 2021 30.10.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 9, 2023