You may also like...
-
Furthermore, the photographs produced in Court would reveal that there is some construction going to install a deity, which appears to be a recent construction only to grab the land of waterbody and thus, the prayer of the fourth respondent to save it or to direct the Tahsildar to open the deity for offering prayers cannot be accepted because the effort is nothing but to somehow encroach the land of waterbody in the name of religion, despite the judgment of the Apex Court not endorsing the construction of a temple or installation of a deity on the Government land and in the instant case, there is nothing on record to show permission to install a deity or construct a temple. With the aforesaid, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.3133 of 2022 is closed. (M.N.B., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.). For the Petitioner in WP.2966/2022 : Mr.S.Venkatesh in WP.7021/2022 : Mr.C.Munusamy For the Respondents in WP.2966/2022 : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 to 3 : Mr.C.Munusamy for R-4 in WP.7021/2022 : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Govt. Pleader for RR 1 and 2 : Mr.S.Venkatesh for R-3 : No appearance for R-4 * * * * * COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice)
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 11, 2022
-
division bench has said the single bench’s order must be taken to be without jurisdiction as it vitiates the order of the division bench. A division bench of Justices S Vaidyanathan and N Anand Venkatesh made the ruling while entertaining a contempt of court petition and a sub-appeal filed by Indian-born US citizen Kiran Chava, seeking custody of his twin children
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 4, 2023
-