The bench of Justice C. Saravanan acknowledged that the petitioner’s explanation for missing the notices “cannot be countenanced.” The Court was inclined to provide one final opportunity to the petitioner to present its case, as the impugned order had been passed without a proper reply.”

[17/11, 14:01] Sekarreporter: “The bench of Justice C. Saravanan acknowledged that the petitioner’s explanation for missing the notices “cannot be countenanced.” The Court was inclined to provide one final opportunity to the petitioner to present its case, as the impugned order had been passed without a proper reply.”
https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/income-tax-scns-missed-after-accounts-executive-resigned-but-records-show-updated-email-actively-used-madras-hc-quashes-with-cost-of-50k-to-cancer-institute-1437426#:~:text=The%20bench%20of%20Justice%20C.%20Saravanan%20acknowledged%20that%20the%20petitioner%27s%20explanation%20for%20missing%20the%20notices%20%22cannot%20be%20countenanced.%22%20The%20Court%20was%20inclined%20to%20provide%20one%20final%20opportunity%20to%20the%20petitioner%20to%20present%20its%20case%2C%20as%20the%20impugned%20order%20had%20been%20passed%20without%20a%20proper%20reply.
[17/11, 14:01] Sekarreporter: 👍👍