Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea alleging discrepancies NEET-PG results. Court: We don’t approve this practice of students just coming into Supreme Court (with) Article 32 (petitions, saying) “declare this and that, this is discrepancy, this is error.” Sorry sir.

by Sekar Reporter · October 27, 2025

Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea alleging discrepancies NEET-PG results.

Court: We don’t approve this practice of students just coming into Supreme Court (with) Article 32 (petitions, saying) “declare this and that, this is discrepancy, this is error.” Sorry sir.

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  Madras University/ Hence the impugned communication is liable to be quashed and it is accordingly quashed.  The order of the learned Single Judge will stand set aside, the Writ Petition will stand allowed and the University will pay the salary due to the appellant for the said one month of reemployment which was denied to him.   10.           This Writ Appeal is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.  (R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)  (K.SURENDER, J.) 17.07.2025 jv Internet      : Yes Index          : No Neutral Citation                     : No Speaking Order To 1.  The Registrar     Univeristy of Madras,     Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 2.  The Members     Convener Committee     University of Madras,     Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and  K.SURENDER  , J. jv W.A.No. 2069 of 2025 17.07.2025

  July 24, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 24, 2025

• 

  Supreme Court Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice V. Mohana dismiss a writ petition filed by K.K. Ramesh of Madurai seeking a CBI probe into alleged horse trading by the ruling Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam #TVK in Tamil Nadu.

  June 19, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published June 19, 2026

• 

  அரசு உதவி பெறும் பள்ளிகளில் ஆசிரியர் அல்லாத பணியிடங்களுக்கு நியமனங்கள் மேற்கொள்ளும் போது, மாவட்ட கல்வி அதிகாரியின் அனுமதி பெற வேண்டும் என விதிகள் கொண்டு வரலாம் என பள்ளிக்கல்வித் துறைக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் அறிவுறுத்தியுள்ளது. [1/13, 15:18] Sekarreporter1: W.A.No.1022 of 2020 Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 26.02.2020 in W.P.No.3939 of 2020. For Appellants : Mr.C.Munusamy

  January 13, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 13, 2021