You may also like...
-
Setting aside the order, justice G R Swaminathan cited that the prosecution had failed to establish that there was a demand for gratification as the complainant turned hostile. The judge further directed the trial court to initiate proceedings against the complainant and directed the registry to monitor the follow up action taken.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 20, 2020
-
Pondichery 3 mla case
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 19, 2021
-
Vinothpandian: 2025 (5) CTC 789 : K Rangasamy vs K devaraj : when plaintiff has not proven financial wherewithal to extend loan , mere admission of defendants signature in promissory note not sufficient blank promissory note filled up by plaintiff , alleged transaction hit by fraud
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 2, 2026