SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Mhc news

Mhc news

[8/13, 18:27] Sekarreporter: ஆளுநரின் ஒப்புதல் இல்லாமல், தங்களை விடுதலை செய்ய தமிழக அரசுக்கு உத்தரவிடக் கோரி நளினி தாக்கல் செய்த வழக்கு நான்கு வாரங்களுக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் தள்ளிவைத்துள்ளது. முன்னாள் பிரதமர் ராஜிவ் கொலை வழக்கில் ஆயுள் கைதிகளாக உள்ள நளினி, முருகன், சாந்தன், பேரறிவாளன்,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Musings on Right to Free Speech & Privacy  Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan      4- Brij Bushan v. State of Delhi     Alongside Romesh Thapar,  Brij Bushan, Publisher and K R Halkani , Editor of Organiser, Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh backed newspaper was also hauled

Musings on Right to Free Speech & Privacy Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan  4- Brij Bushan v. State of Delhi Alongside Romesh Thapar,  Brij Bushan, Publisher and K R Halkani , Editor of Organiser, Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh backed newspaper was also hauled

    Musings on Right to Free Speech & Privacy Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan    4- Brij Bushan v. State of Delhi   Alongside Romesh Thapar,  Brij Bushan, Publisher and K R Halkani , Editor of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Musings on Right to Free Speech & Privacy  Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan      5- Schenck v. United States 249 U.S. 47 (1919)     The famed First Amendment to US Constitution reads, “ Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise

Musings on Right to Free Speech & Privacy Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan  5- Schenck v. United States 249 U.S. 47 (1919) The famed First Amendment to US Constitution reads, “ Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise

    Musings on Right to Free Speech & Privacy Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan    5- Schenck v. United States 249 U.S. 47 (1919)   The famed First Amendment to US Constitution reads, “ Congress shall...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Full order of THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN                                         W.P.No. 17091 of 2004 The Managing Director      M/s.Tata Tea Ltd.,- In the light of the aforesaid legislative process, if the present case is tested, it can be easily understood that the word ‘establishment’ has not been defined under the Act, 1972 and what is not specifically mentioned in the enactment cannot be borrowed or legislatively incorporated in the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act to give a special meaning to ‘plantation’ and extend powers to the Central Government to inspect the plantation. Finding much force in the contention of the petitioners, this Court is of the view that the impugned notification has no legs to stand and the same is liable to be interfered with. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed. It is needless to state here that this order will not preclude the State Government Authorities VAIDYANATHAN, J. –

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED 25.06.2021   CORAM :   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN                                           W.P.No. 17091 of 2004 The Managing Director M/s.Tata Tea Ltd., No.1, Bishop...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Full order sports THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN   W.P. No. 16953 of 2021 Sameeha Barvin D/o. Mujith—-Therefore, by taking note of the above, as a special case, this Court as an interim measure, directs the petitioner to report before the third respondent tomorrow (14.08.2021) or day-after-tomorrow (15.08.2021) and on her appearance, the third respondent shall declare the petitioner as selected and permit her to participate in the Fourth World Deaf Athletics Championship which is scheduled to be conducted at Lublin, Poland from 23.08.2021 to 28.08.2021 under the Women Category. Post the writ petition for passing further orders on 18.08.2021.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED : 13.08.2021   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN   W.P. No. 16953 of 2021   Sameeha Barvin D/o. Mujith C/o. Mohammed Ghowe...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

20.12.2004-ஆம் ஆண்டிற்கு முன்னர் சொத்தில் பாகப் பிரிவினை செய்யப்பட்டு இருந்தால் பெண்களுக்கு சொத்தில் உரிமை இல்லை என சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற அமர்வு அதிரடி உத்தரவு. [8/14, 15:56] Sekarreporter: THE MADRAS HIGH COURT DIVISION BENCH OF JUSTICE T.RAJA & JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKARAN ORDERED, (MARRIED AND UNMARRIED) WOMEN HAVE NO RIGHT TO PROPERTY PRIOR TO THE PARTITION EFFECTED ON 20.12.2004:-

[8/14, 15:56] Sekarreporter: 20.12.2004-ஆம் ஆண்டிற்கு முன்னர் சொத்தில் பாகப் பிரிவினை செய்யப்பட்டு இருந்தால் பெண்களுக்கு சொத்தில் உரிமை இல்லை என சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற அமர்வு அதிரடி உத்தரவு. [8/14, 15:56] Sekarreporter: THE MADRAS HIGH COURT DIVISION BENCH OF JUSTICE T.RAJA &...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version