SEKAR REPORTER Blog
impugned order passed under Section 74 of the GST Act, 2017. An option has been given to the petitioner to pay the tax, interest and 50% of the penalty, within a period of 30 days from the date of communication of the orders dated 24.03.2023 pursuant to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.12.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W. P.Nos.12191, 12192, 12402 and 13140 of 2024and W.M.P.Nos.13283,13284, 13285, 13286, 13528, 13529 and 14280 of 2024...
the Disciplinary Authority has arrived at a conclusion based upon the material available before them for misappropriation of funds, apart from the charge of corruption. Such finding was approved by the Appellate Authority on re-appreciation of evidences. Further, through the
2026:MHC:371 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON: 09-01-2026 PRONOUNCED ON: 30-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WA No. 1827 of 2021 1. S.Packiam...
Justice G. Jayachandran and Justice K. K. Ramakrishnan held that the service rendered as a full-time Village Assistant after 01.06.1995 cannot be treated as non-provincialised
[16/02, 07:28] Meta AI: மாதுரை உயர் நீதிமன்றம், கிராம உதவியாளராக பணியாற்றிய காலத்தை ஓய்வூதியத்திற்கு கணக்கில் எடுத்துக் கொள்ள வேண்டும் என்று தீர்ப்பளித்துள்ளது. 01.06.1995-க்குப் பிறகு கிராம உதவியாளராக பணியாற்றியவர்களின் சேவையை “பிராந்தியமயமாக்கப்படாத சேவை” என்று கருத முடியாது என்று நீதிமன்றம் கூறியது. கிராம உதவியாளர்களாக...
appellant leased out acquired lands for developing Industrial Park for a period of 99 years for a lease amount of Rs.1/- p.a. and therefore, Clause 39 of the lease agreement would squarely apply for recovering sub-leasing charges. Further, SIPCOT is empowered to impose conditions and
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.02.2026 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.A.Nos.2043 and 920 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos.17339 and 9197...
Mother-Father Temple Street) has been rightly rejected by the learned Single Judge, as no mandamus can be issued to the State authorities in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the street to be given a particular name.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.285 of 2026 R.K.Venkatesh S/o. T.S.Radhakrishnan, No.19, Chetty...
Naming of a street is certainly not liable to be interfered with the exercise of the powers under Article 226. 6. As the petitioner has no legal righ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 35844 of 2025 & WMP No. 40092 of 2025 R.K.Venkatesh S/o.T.S.Radhakrishnan, No.19, Chetty Street, Thiruthani,...