12.In view of the above detailed discussion, we are of the firm view that the order of the learned Single Judge is liable to be interfered with. Accordingly, the present Writ Appeal is allowed by setting aside the impugned writ order dated 14.03.2022 made in W.P.No.11568 of 2011. No costs.

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

February 17, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published February 17, 2026

12.In view of the above detailed discussion, we are of the firm view that the order of the learned Single Judge is liable to be interfered with. Accordingly, the present Writ Appeal is allowed by setting aside the impugned writ order dated 14.03.2022 made in W.P.No.11568 of 2011. No costs.

2026:MHC:565 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON: 06-02-2026 PRONOUNCED ON: 12-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WA No. 2616 of 2022 AND CMP No. 20757...

Uncategorized

February 17, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published February 17, 2026

prosecution has established the major charges and had proved its case beyond all reasonable doubts against all accused. 33. In view of the judgment of reversal pronounced today convicting the respondents 2 to 24/A1 to A23 for the charged offences, the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 20.01.2026 Delivered on : 10.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Crl.A.No. 427 of 2019 Amutha W/o.Baskar …… Appellant...

நீதிபதி அனிதா சுமந்த், வழக்கை விசாரித்து, DCGI-யின் நியமனம் செல்லுபடியாகும் என்று கூறியுள்ளார். வழக்கு தொடர்ந்தவரின் வாதங்களை நிராகரித்த நீதிபதி, DCGI-யின் நியமனம் சட்டப்படி செல்லுபடியாகும் என்று கூறியுள்ளார்.

Uncategorized

February 17, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published February 17, 2026

நீதிபதி அனிதா சுமந்த், வழக்கை விசாரித்து, DCGI-யின் நியமனம் செல்லுபடியாகும் என்று கூறியுள்ளார். வழக்கு தொடர்ந்தவரின் வாதங்களை நிராகரித்த நீதிபதி, DCGI-யின் நியமனம் சட்டப்படி செல்லுபடியாகும் என்று கூறியுள்ளார்.

[17/02, 17:33] sekarreporter1: “filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of quo warranto, directing the respondents to call the records to quash and set aside the impugned...

Uncategorized

February 17, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published February 17, 2026

We are satisfied on the aspect of public interest. As to the competence of the present DCGI, no material has been placed before us to indicate otherwise. It is not even the case of the petitioner that the DCGI is ineligible or incompetent, though in the pleadings, petitioner makes incidental

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.11.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W. P.(MD)No.6882 of 2025and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.5158 & 5159 of 2025 D.Muthu … Petitioner /Vs./...

Uncategorized

February 17, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published February 17, 2026

#BREAKING: #SupremeCourt flags “alarming” trend of #AI being used for drafting petitions CJI Surya Kant: We have been alarmingly told that some lawyers have started using AI for drafting. Justice BV Nagarathna: There was a case of Mercy vs Mankind which does not exist. CJI: there was something with Justice Dipankar Datta also. All precedents cited never existed. Justice Nagarathna: Then some are citing real supreme court cases, but those quoted portions do not even exist in the judgment

#BREAKING: #SupremeCourt flags “alarming” trend of #AI being used for drafting petitions CJI Surya Kant: We have been alarmingly told that some lawyers have started using AI for drafting. Justice BV Nagarathna: There was...

Uncategorized

February 17, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published February 17, 2026

quote from Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy seems to be from a Madras High Court case, where he considered the social background of workers from a self-help group

[17/02, 13:12] sekarreporter1: [17/02, 13:12] sekarreporter1: “Tired of too many ads? Go Ad Free Now “Though, under normal circumstances, it should be considered a serious charge, one must consider that this is an organization...

Uncategorized

February 17, 2026

by Sekar Reporter · Published February 17, 2026

வருமானத்துக்கு அதிகமாக சொத்து சேர்த்ததாக எம்பி நவாஸ் கனி மீது கொடுத்த புகார் மீது வருமானத்துறை விசாரிக்க வேண்டும் என்று கூறி ஐகோர்ட்டில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது இந்த வழக்கை தலைமை நீதிபதி பெஞ்ச் விசாரித்து வருமானவரித்துறை பதில் மனு தாக்கல் செய்ய நோட்டீஸ் அனுப்ப உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. For income tax asg ARL sundaresan and income tax senior counsel ap srinivasan

வருமானத்துக்கு அதிகமாக சொத்து சேர்த்ததாக எம்பி நவாஸ் கனி மீது கொடுத்த புகார் மீது வருமானத்துறை விசாரிக்க வேண்டும் என்று கூறி ஐகோர்ட்டில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளது இந்த வழக்கை தலைமை நீதிபதி பெஞ்ச் விசாரித்து வருமானவரித்துறை பதில் மனு தாக்கல் செய்ய நோட்டீஸ் அனுப்ப உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது...

SEKAR REPORTER

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

12.In view of the above detailed discussion, we are of the firm view that the order of the learned Single Judge is liable to be interfered with. Accordingly, the present Writ Appeal is allowed by setting aside the impugned writ order dated 14.03.2022 made in W.P.No.11568 of 2011. No costs.

prosecution has established the major charges and had proved its case beyond all reasonable doubts against all accused. 33. In view of the judgment of reversal pronounced today convicting the respondents 2 to 24/A1 to A23 for the charged offences, the

We are satisfied on the aspect of public interest. As to the competence of the present DCGI, no material has been placed before us to indicate otherwise. It is not even the case of the petitioner that the DCGI is ineligible or incompetent, though in the pleadings, petitioner makes incidental

quote from Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy seems to be from a Madras High Court case, where he considered the social background of workers from a self-help group

Recent Posts

Recent Posts