SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Temple Land case govt appeal W.A.Nos.64, 72 and 74 of 2022 and  C.M.P.Nos.619, 664 and 670 of 2022  PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and  SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.      (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.)  Challenge in this group of appeals is

Temple Land case govt appeal W.A.Nos.64, 72 and 74 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.619, 664 and 670 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.     (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Challenge in this group of appeals is

W.A.Nos.64, 72 and 74 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.619, 664 and 670 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Challenge in...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Temple land casemhc bench refuse  to stay judge mahadevan  order bench  PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and  SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.      (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.)   Learned Additional Advocate General has taken this Court through the conclusions/ final directions recorded by learned single Judge, more particularly contained in para 22 of the impugned order. T.Kokilavane, learned advocate accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent in W.A.No.64 of 2022 and for the fourth respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.V.B.R.Menon, learned advocate accepts notice for the first respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and Mr.A.Radhakrishnan, party-in-person, appears for the first respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader (H.R. & C.E.) accepts notice on behalf of respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.64 of 2022, second respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and for respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.74 of 2022.

Temple land casemhc bench refuse to stay judge mahadevan order bench PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.     (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Learned Additional Advocate General has taken this Court through the conclusions/ final directions recorded by learned single Judge, more particularly contained in para 22 of the impugned order. T.Kokilavane, learned advocate accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent in W.A.No.64 of 2022 and for the fourth respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.V.B.R.Menon, learned advocate accepts notice for the first respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and Mr.A.Radhakrishnan, party-in-person, appears for the first respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader (H.R. & C.E.) accepts notice on behalf of respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.64 of 2022, second respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and for respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.74 of 2022.

W.A.Nos.64, 72 and 74 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.619, 664 and 670 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Challenge in...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY     Crl.R.C.No.607 of 2014     J.Rosy Kumari                                                                 .. Petitioner

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.607 of 2014   J.Rosy Kumari                                                                 .. Petitioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Judgment Reserved on :  24.11.2021   Judgment Pronounced on :  30.11.2021   CORAM :   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY   Crl.R.C.No.607 of 2014  ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: Today Tips for Judicial Exam (Magistrate/App): 30-01-2022  Section 39 Specific Relief Act, 1963 deals with *Mandatory Injunction*

Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: Today Tips for Judicial Exam (Magistrate/App): 30-01-2022 Section 39 Specific Relief Act, 1963 deals with *Mandatory Injunction*

[1/30, 11:06] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/SlIxki7qBqU [1/30, 11:07] Sekarreporter: [1/30, 10:10] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: Today Tips for Judicial Exam (Magistrate/App): 30-01-2022 Section 39 Specific Relief Act, 1963 deals with *Mandatory Injunction* Object of this provision is...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Mhc direct to fill up vacancies in drt drat full order of The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA and  The Hon`ble  Mrs.Justice S. SRIMATHY  WP(MD) No.605 of 2022  THE DRT , MADURAI BAR ASSOCIATION

Mhc direct to fill up vacancies in drt drat full order of The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA and The Hon`ble  Mrs.Justice S. SRIMATHY WP(MD) No.605 of 2022 THE DRT , MADURAI BAR ASSOCIATION

சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்தின் மதுரை பெஞ்ச் முன் (சிறப்பு அசல் அதிகார வரம்பு) திங்கட்கிழமை, ஜனவரி இருபத்தி நான்காம் நாள் இரண்டாயிரத்து இருபத்தி இரண்டு வழங்கவும் மாண்புமிகு திருமதி. நீதியரசர் புஷ்பா சத்தியநாராயணா மற்றும் மாண்புமிகு திருமதி. நீதிபதி எஸ். ஸ்ரீமதி 2022 இன் WP(MD) எண்.605...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Case agsinst stamp duty  full order ofTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA  AND  THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY     C.M.A.No.1836 of 2005.    For govt ag and  aag j ravinthiren.  For vodafone senior Arl sundatesan

Case agsinst stamp duty full order ofTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY C.M.A.No.1836 of 2005. For govt ag and aag j ravinthiren. For vodafone senior Arl sundatesan

º IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Judgment Reserved on :  06.01.2022   Judgment Pronounced on : 28.01.2022   CORAM :   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version