SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Inbadurai Mla: *தேர்தல் நடத்தை விதிமுறைகளை மீறும் தமிழக அரசு!* *தேர்தல் நடைபெறும் பகுதிகளுக்கு 17 போலீஸ் அதிகாரிகளை டிரான்ஸ்பர் செய்த உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்ய கோரி அதிமுக சார்பில் முன்னாள் எம்எல்ஏ இன்பதுரை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் அவசர மனு!*

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 31, 2022

Inbadurai Mla: *தேர்தல் நடத்தை விதிமுறைகளை மீறும் தமிழக அரசு!* *தேர்தல் நடைபெறும் பகுதிகளுக்கு 17 போலீஸ் அதிகாரிகளை டிரான்ஸ்பர் செய்த உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்ய கோரி அதிமுக சார்பில் முன்னாள் எம்எல்ஏ இன்பதுரை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் அவசர மனு!*

[1/31, 10:56] Inbadurai Mla: *தேர்தல் நடத்தை விதிமுறைகளை மீறும் தமிழக அரசு!* *தேர்தல் நடைபெறும் பகுதிகளுக்கு 17 போலீஸ் அதிகாரிகளை டிரான்ஸ்பர் செய்த உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்ய கோரி அதிமுக சார்பில் முன்னாள் எம்எல்ஏ இன்பதுரை உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் அவசர மனு!* *இன்றே விசாரணைக்கு எடுத்துக் கொள்ளவேண்டும்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1488026393589927936?t=1UKEF0su6XdLyoki2DuNbw&s=08 [1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter: ACJ is elevated as CJ [1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter: சென்னை ஐகோர்ட்டில் தற்காலிக தலைமை நீதிபதி ஐகோர்ட்டின் தலைமை நீதிபதியாக நியமிக்க வேண்டும் என்று சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் பரிந்துரை செய்துள்ளது https://t.co/jyJltNKPi1

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 31, 2022

[1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1488026393589927936?t=1UKEF0su6XdLyoki2DuNbw&s=08 [1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter: ACJ is elevated as CJ [1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter: சென்னை ஐகோர்ட்டில் தற்காலிக தலைமை நீதிபதி ஐகோர்ட்டின் தலைமை நீதிபதியாக நியமிக்க வேண்டும் என்று சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் பரிந்துரை செய்துள்ளது https://t.co/jyJltNKPi1

[1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1488026393589927936?t=1UKEF0su6XdLyoki2DuNbw&s=08 [1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter: ACJ is elevated as CJ [1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter: சென்னை ஐகோர்ட்டில் தற்காலிக தலைமை நீதிபதி ஐகோர்ட்டின் தலைமை நீதிபதியாக நியமிக்க வேண்டும் என்று சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட் பரிந்துரை செய்துள்ளது   [1/31, 11:19] Sekarreporter:...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
this is what exactly the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, had put it Shimbhu and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana4,  that is, primary object of the sentencing policy in the offense of rape being, the deterrent message to the society, In the result, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the Trial Court and the Appellate Court stands confirmed.                                                                                                             23.12.2021 Index : yes HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.708 of 2014 For R1               : Mr.L.Baskaran                                           Government Advocate                                           (Criminal Side)  

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 31, 2022

this is what exactly the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, had put it Shimbhu and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana4,  that is, primary object of the sentencing policy in the offense of rape being, the deterrent message to the society, In the result, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the Trial Court and the Appellate Court stands confirmed.                                                                                                             23.12.2021 Index : yes HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.708 of 2014 For R1               : Mr.L.Baskaran                                           Government Advocate                                           (Criminal Side)  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Order Reserved on :  14.12.2021   Order Pronounced on :  23.12.2021   CORAM :   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY   Crl.R.C.No.708 of 2014  ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
detenue says that she wants to stay with her mother and not interested in joining with her husband, due to matrimonial discard.  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN   H.C.P.(MD) No.24 of 2022. V

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 31, 2022

detenue says that she wants to stay with her mother and not interested in joining with her husband, due to matrimonial discard.  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN   H.C.P.(MD) No.24 of 2022. V

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT   DATED :  21.01.2022   CORAM:   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN   H.C.P.(MD) No.24 of 2022 ¶ V.Karthik                                                                ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Temple Land case govt appeal W.A.Nos.64, 72 and 74 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.619, 664 and 670 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.     (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Challenge in this group of appeals is

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 30, 2022

Temple Land case govt appeal W.A.Nos.64, 72 and 74 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.619, 664 and 670 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.     (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Challenge in this group of appeals is

W.A.Nos.64, 72 and 74 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.619, 664 and 670 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Challenge in...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Temple land casemhc bench refuse to stay judge mahadevan order bench PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.     (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Learned Additional Advocate General has taken this Court through the conclusions/ final directions recorded by learned single Judge, more particularly contained in para 22 of the impugned order. T.Kokilavane, learned advocate accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent in W.A.No.64 of 2022 and for the fourth respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.V.B.R.Menon, learned advocate accepts notice for the first respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and Mr.A.Radhakrishnan, party-in-person, appears for the first respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader (H.R. & C.E.) accepts notice on behalf of respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.64 of 2022, second respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and for respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.74 of 2022.

Uncategorized

 by · Published January 30, 2022

Temple land casemhc bench refuse to stay judge mahadevan order bench PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.     (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Learned Additional Advocate General has taken this Court through the conclusions/ final directions recorded by learned single Judge, more particularly contained in para 22 of the impugned order. T.Kokilavane, learned advocate accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent in W.A.No.64 of 2022 and for the fourth respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.V.B.R.Menon, learned advocate accepts notice for the first respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and Mr.A.Radhakrishnan, party-in-person, appears for the first respondent in W.A.No.74 of 2022. Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned Special Government Pleader (H.R. & C.E.) accepts notice on behalf of respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.64 of 2022, second respondent in W.A.No.72 of 2022 and for respondents 2 and 3 in W.A.No.74 of 2022.

W.A.Nos.64, 72 and 74 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.619, 664 and 670 of 2022 PARESH UPADHYAY, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. (Order of the Court was made by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Challenge in...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version