Naveenkumar moorthy advt interview in illayaraja case video

by Sekar Reporter · December 29, 2020

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  498A jail to husband secound marriage proved full order of THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA Criminal Appeal No.246 of 2012

  February 5, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 5, 2022

• 

  Madras University/ Hence the impugned communication is liable to be quashed and it is accordingly quashed.  The order of the learned Single Judge will stand set aside, the Writ Petition will stand allowed and the University will pay the salary due to the appellant for the said one month of reemployment which was denied to him.   10.           This Writ Appeal is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.  (R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)  (K.SURENDER, J.) 17.07.2025 jv Internet      : Yes Index          : No Neutral Citation                     : No Speaking Order To 1.  The Registrar     Univeristy of Madras,     Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 2.  The Members     Convener Committee     University of Madras,     Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and  K.SURENDER  , J. jv W.A.No. 2069 of 2025 17.07.2025

  July 24, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 24, 2025

• 

  Justice C. Saravanan held that since the offline application had been filed in time, it must be considered valid. However, in line with the CBIC Circular, the petitioner was directed to additionally file the rectification application online within 30 days from receipt of the order.

  August 23, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published August 23, 2025