Mr AR L SUNDARESAN Sr Advocate, Appeared on behalf of AIADMK Party in the OBC Reservation case in UG and PG Medical Courses and Dental Courses in the ALL INDIA QUOTA seats. The prime argument was that the ALL INDIA QUOTA seats are not surrendered seats to the Central Government, they are Contributed Seats to the ALL INDIA QUOTA only. The Said seats are not INSULATED from reservation for SC, ST and. OBC.read full
That Rule 5(5) of the Medical Council of India Regulations for UG courses and Rule 9(4) of the Medical Council of India Regulations for PG admissions provided for Reservation as per the rules prevailing in the respective states.
That the said rule is binding on the Union of India also and when SC and ST reservation is granted in ALL INDIA QUOTA seats , the argument that there cannot be reservation for OBC deserves to be rejected. And that in the State of TN 69% reservation is the rule as per the State Reservation Act 1993 which is in the IX Schedule. As such as per Art 15(5) of the Constitution, 1993 State Law and MCI Regulation 5(5) and 9(4) reservation should be granted in ALL INDIA QUOTA seats also as per the State Percentages .
![[6/21, 07:54] Sekarreporter: l[6/21, 06:35] Judge Suthantheram: Dear Sekar, I am sending an order of Division Bench of Madras High Court and well written comment about that order in Live Law by Mr. Lakshminarayanan, Advocate. Kindly post them for the knowledge of others. [6/21, 06:36] Judge Suthantheram: https://www.livelaw.in/amp/columns/cant-a-single-bench-of-high-court-issue-directions-to-registry-to-circulate-a-judgment-176000 [6/21, 07:50] Sekarreporter: [6/21, 06:35] Judge Suthantheram: Dear Sekar, I am sending an order of Division Bench of Madras High Court and well written comment about that order in Live Law by Mr. Lakshminarayanan, Advocate. Kindly post them for the knowledge of others. [6/21, 06:36] Judge Suthantheram: https://www.livelaw.in/amp/columns/cant-a-single-bench-of-high-court-issue-directions-to-registry-to-circulate-a-judgment-176000 [6/21, 07:52] Sekarreporter: WA No. 1161 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 24-03-2021 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBBIAH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN Writ Appeal No. 1161 of 2020 — The High Court of Judicature at Madras rep. by its Registrar General High Court, Madras .. Appellant Versus 1. A. Venkatesan 2. The State Information Commissioner Tamil Nadu Information Commission No.2, Sir Thiyagarayar Road Eldams Road Junction Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018 3. The Superintendent of Police/ 1st Appellate Authority Tiruppur District 4. The Public Information Officer/ Additional Superintendent of Police Police Head Office Tiruppur District 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Udumalpet Sub Division Tiruppur District 1/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ https://www.sekarreporter.com/l6-21-0635-judge-suthantheram-dear-sekar-i-am-sending-an-order-of-division-bench-of-madras-high-court-and-well-written-comment-about-that-order-in-live-law-by-mr-lakshminarayanan-advocate-k/ [6/21, 08:02] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/2jQhzarp22w [6/21, 08:07] Sekarreporter: [6/21, 08:02] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/2jQhzarp22w [6/21, 08:07] Sekarreporter: mhc advocate karpagapriya mam speech #sekarreporter#regarding சைபர் crime# [6/21, 08:07] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/OtJyQgvhyBQ](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
